右美托咪定
异丙酚
医学
镇静
麻醉
机械通风
谵妄
重症监护室
心脏外科
随机对照试验
通风(建筑)
装载剂量
外科
内科学
机械工程
重症监护医学
工程类
作者
M Preveden,Ranko Zdravković,Sanja Vicković,Vanja Vujic,Mirko Todić,Nikola Mladenović,Nina Dračina,Vanja Drljevic Todic,Tijana Pantić,Bogdan Okiljević,Nikolina Markovic,Aleksandra Kovač,Ronald F. Zec,Andrej Preveden,Milanka Tatić
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2023-08-01
卷期号:27 (16): 7644-7652
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202308_33418
摘要
The aim of our study was to compare the clinical effects of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs. propofol in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and analyze their effects on the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and total hospital stay.The study included 120 patients who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups of 60 patients. The first group was sedated with continuous dexmedetomidine in doses 0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/h. The second group was sedated with propofol in doses 1-2 mg/kg/h.Patients sedated with dexmedetomidine required 2.2 hours less time on MV (p<0.001). There was a positive correlation between the duration of MV and the ICU length of stay (r=0.368; p<0.001), as well as between the duration of MV and the total hospital stay (r=0.204; p=0.025). Delirium occurred in the postoperative period in 25% of patients sedated with propofol, while in the dexmedetomidine group it was only 11.7% (p=0.059). Patients who developed delirium had a significantly longer duration of MV (12.6±5.4 vs. 9.3±2.5 hours, p=0.010).Postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine, compared to propofol, reduces the duration of MV, but does not influence the length of stay in the ICU and length of hospitalization after open heart surgery.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI