医学
内科学
肝细胞癌
比例危险模型
倾向得分匹配
回顾性队列研究
危险系数
队列
生存分析
肝移植
多元分析
置信区间
肿瘤科
外科
胃肠病学
移植
作者
Zhihao Li,I. Chen,Leonardo Centonze,C.T.J. Magyar,Woo Jin Choi,Sachin Shah,Grainne M. O’Kane,Arndt Vogel,Luciano De Carlis,Jan Lerut,Quirino Lai,Neil Mehta,Chao‐Long Chen,Gonzalo Sapisochín
标识
DOI:10.1097/lvt.0000000000000501
摘要
Background : Post-transplant HCC recurrence significantly impacts survival, yet its management is challenging due to limited evidence. With recent advancements in HCC treatment, updated data on managing recurrent disease is needed. Methods : In this retrospective study across six centers (2000-2022), we employed Cox proportional-hazards regression and log-rank tests to assess survival differences. A prognostic score model was developed to categorize patient survival. Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors was evaluated through propensity score matching. Results : In our study, 431 of 3349 (14%) transplanted HCC patients developed recurrence within a median interval of 18 (IQR:9-32) months. 147 (34%) underwent curative-intent treatments, 207 (48%) received palliative treatments, and 77 (18%) were given best-supportive care. Patients undergoing curative-intent treatments had better survival from the time of recurrence with median survival of 45 (95%CI:36-63) months and 1/3/5-year survival of 90%/56%/43% compared to those receiving non-curative treatments (median: 11 (95%CI:10-13) months, 1/3/5-year survival of 46%/10%/7%, log-rank p <0.001). Patients with recurrence diagnosed in the era 2018-2022 showed improved survival over previous era (HR 0.64 (95%CI:0.47-0.86)). Multivariable analysis identified 5 prognostic factors: ineligibility for curative-intent treatment (HR 3.5 (95%CI:2.7-4.6)), recurrence within 1-year (HR 1.7 (95%CI:1.3-2.1)), poor tumor differentiation (HR 1.5 (95%CI:1.1-1.9)), RETREAT score ≥3 (HR 1.4 (95%CI:1.1-1.8)) and AFP at recurrence ≥400 ng/mL (HR 1.4 (95%CI:1.1-1.9)). These factors contributed to a prognostic scoring system (0-9) that stratified patients into three prognosis groups. Both propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable regression indicated that lenvatinib was not statistically superior to sorafenib in terms of efficacy. Conclusion : Curative-intent treatments should be advocated for patients with post-transplant recurrence whenever possible. Prognostic factors linked to aggressive tumor biology significantly influence survival. Advancements in HCC management have improved survival outcomes over the past five years.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI