Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies

医学 观察研究 荟萃分析 优势比 2型糖尿病 内科学 随机对照试验 心力衰竭 相对风险 安慰剂 磷酸西他列汀 置信区间 队列研究 糖尿病 病理 内分泌学 替代医学
作者
Ling Li,Sheyu Li,Ke Deng,Jiali Liu,Per Olav Vandvik,Pujing Zhao,Longhao Zhang,Jiantong Shen,Małgorzata M Bała,Zahra N. Sohani,Evelyn M. Wong,Jason W. Busse,Shanil Ebrahim,Germán Málaga,Lorena P Rios,Yingqiang Wang,Qunfei Chen,Gordon Guyatt,Xin Sun
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.i610
摘要

Objectives To examine the association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and the risk of heart failure or hospital admission for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov searched up to 25 June 2015, and communication with experts. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared DPP-4 inhibitors against placebo, lifestyle modification, or active antidiabetic drugs in adults with type 2 diabetes, and explicitly reported the outcome of heart failure or hospital admission for heart failure. Data collection and analysis Teams of paired reviewers independently screened for eligible studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data using standardised, pilot tested forms. Data from trials and observational studies were pooled separately; quality of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Results Eligible studies included 43 trials (n=68 775) and 12 observational studies (nine cohort studies, three nested case-control studies; n=1 777 358). Pooling of 38 trials reporting heart failure provided low quality evidence for a possible similar risk of heart failure between DPP-4 inhibitor use versus control (42/15 701 v 33/12 591; odds ratio 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.56); risk difference 2 fewer (19 fewer to 28 more) events per 1000 patients with type 2 diabetes over five years). The observational studies provided effect estimates generally consistent with trial findings, but with very low quality evidence. Pooling of the five trials reporting admission for heart failure provided moderate quality evidence for an increased risk in patients treated with DPP-4 inhibitors versus control (622/18 554 v 552/18 474; 1.13 (1.00 to 1.26); 8 more (0 more to 16 more)). The pooling of adjusted estimates from observational studies similarly suggested (with very low quality evidence) a possible increased risk of admission for heart failure (adjusted odds ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 2.09) in patients treated with DPP-4 inhibitors (exclusively sitagliptin) versus no use. Conclusions The relative effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on the risk of heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes is uncertain, given the relatively short follow-up and low quality of evidence. Both randomised controlled trials and observational studies, however, suggest that these drugs may increase the risk of hospital admission for heart failure in those patients with existing cardiovascular diseases or multiple risk factors for vascular diseases, compared with no use.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
傲娇的寇发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
zhou123432发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
万能图书馆应助猫小咪采纳,获得10
刚刚
兴奋大船完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小谢完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Ava应助日暮不评采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
精神发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
材料生发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
搜集达人应助xuxuxuxuxu采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI6应助tracer采纳,获得10
2秒前
汉堡包应助小右采纳,获得30
3秒前
怡然平萱完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小二郎应助九川采纳,获得10
3秒前
sun完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
du完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
成事在人307完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助无定采纳,获得10
4秒前
小不点完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
士载完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
苏苏发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
金蕊完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Owen应助可靠之玉采纳,获得10
6秒前
乔乔完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xuxuxuxuxu完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
marson发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
桐桐应助微笑向卉采纳,获得10
8秒前
壮观听芹关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
科研通AI6应助nunup5采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
guozizi驳回了Owen应助
9秒前
彭凯发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
小硕土川完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
sang发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Wei完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
罗小马完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
网络安全 SEMI 标准 ( SEMI E187, SEMI E188 and SEMI E191.) 1000
计划经济时代的工厂管理与工人状况(1949-1966)——以郑州市国营工厂为例 500
INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY TO SUPPORT STEM LEARNING AND 21ST CENTURY SKILLS: PREPARING NEW TEACHERS TO IMPLEMENT PROJECT AND PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING 500
Why America Can't Retrench (And How it Might) 400
Two New β-Class Milbemycins from Streptomyces bingchenggensis: Fermentation, Isolation, Structure Elucidation and Biological Properties 300
Modern Britain, 1750 to the Present (第2版) 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 催化作用 遗传学 冶金 电极 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4614925
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4018912
关于积分的说明 12440362
捐赠科研通 3701783
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2041353
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1074080
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 957723