Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine on dementia and cognitive function: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta‐analysis

医学 痴呆 荟萃分析 认知 传统医学 随机对照试验 梅德林 精神科 内科学 政治学 法学 疾病
作者
Ratree Sawangjit,Chorthip Chuenchom,Thanchanok Sanverm,Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk,Jariya Jiranukool,Rodchares Nithipaijit,Saranrat Sadoyu,Chankiat Phianchana,Peerawat Jinatongthai
出处
期刊:Phytotherapy Research [Wiley]
卷期号:37 (6): 2364-2380 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1002/ptr.7759
摘要

This study aims to summarize the effects of herbs on dementia and assess the strength of evidence. Six international and local databases were searched from inception to October 2021 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials investigated the effects of herbal medicine on dementia or cognitive function. Two researchers independently extracted data, assessed the methodological quality, and rated the credibility of evidence according to established criteria. Thirty-seven articles evaluating 13 herbal medicines were included. Of these, 65% were rated critically low using AMSTAR2. Of 90 unique outcomes, 41 (45.6%) were statistically significant based on random effects model (p ≤ .05). Only 3 herbs were supported by suggestive evidence whereas the others were supported by weak evidence. The suggestive evidence supported benefits of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) plus pharmacotherapy (WMD:1.84; 95% CI: 1.34, 2.35) and Vinpocetine (WMD: -0.94; 95%CI: -1.50, -0.38) on improving cognitive function assessing by Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Syndrom-Kurz-Test, respectively. Moreover, suggestive evidence supported benefit of Huperzia serrata on improving Activities of Daily Living (WMD:-7.18; 95%CI: -9.12, -5.23). No SAE was reported. In conclusion, several herbs were used for improving dementia and cognitive function but recent evidence were limited by the small sample size and poor methodological quality. Therefore, further large and well-designed studies are needed to support the evidence.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
CipherSage应助化工葫芦娃采纳,获得10
1秒前
思路三发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
辛勤的莹芝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
隐形曼青应助负责月光采纳,获得10
5秒前
Lyhhh发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
杳鸢应助猜不猜不采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
秃头医生完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
一一应助独特觅翠采纳,获得10
10秒前
共享精神应助徐昊雯采纳,获得10
11秒前
简qiu完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
Lyhhh完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
越心祁完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
LX完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
hs发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
脆皮发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
包容扬发布了新的文献求助30
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
www完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
宋小花儿完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
深情安青应助李锐采纳,获得10
24秒前
bookgg完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
orange发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
科研通AI2S应助李晶采纳,获得10
25秒前
26秒前
Khaos_0929完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
Endlessway应助花花采纳,获得20
27秒前
30秒前
璐璐完成签到,获得积分20
31秒前
开心的眼睛完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
Sarcolestes leedsi Lydekker, an ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of England 500
Machine Learning for Polymer Informatics 500
《关于整治突出dupin问题的实施意见》(厅字〔2019〕52号) 500
2024 Medicinal Chemistry Reviews 480
Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments 450
Geochemistry, 2nd Edition 地球化学经典教科书第二版 401
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3218081
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2867382
关于积分的说明 8156036
捐赠科研通 2534277
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1366865
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 644866
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 617922