抛光
丙烯酸树脂
轮廓仪
材料科学
表面粗糙度
表面光洁度
复合材料
涂层
作者
Margarida Quezada,Helena Salgado,André Correia,Carlos Fernandes,Patrícia Fonseca
出处
期刊:Biomedicines
[MDPI AG]
日期:2022-08-14
卷期号:10 (8): 1971-1971
被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.3390/biomedicines10081971
摘要
This investigation aims to determine the effect of the same polishing protocol on the surface roughness (Ra) of different resins obtained by different processing techniques. Acrylic resins obtained by CAD/CAM technology overcame the disadvantages identified in conventional materials. A total of thirty samples (six of each resin): self-cured, heat-polymerized, injection molded, CAD/CAM 3D-printed and CAD/CAM milled were prepared. JOTA® Kit 1877 DENTUR POLISH was used to polish the samples by two techniques: manual and mechanized, with a prototype for guided polishing exclusively developed for this investigation. The Ra was measured by a profilometer. The values were analyzed using ANOVA, Games−Howell post-hoc test and One-sample t-test, with p < 0.05. Manual polishing produces lower values of Ra compared to mechanized polishing, except for injected molded resins (p = 0.713). Manual polishing reveals significant differences between the resin pairs milling/3D-printing (p = 0.012) and thermopolymerizable/milling (p = 0.024). In the mechanized technique only, significant differences regarding the Ra values were found between the self-cured/3D-printed (p = 0.004) and self-cured/thermopolymerizable pair resins (p = 0.004). Differences in surface roughness values can be attributed to the inherent characteristics of the resin and the respective processing techniques.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI