电池(电)
危险废物
欧洲联盟
锂(药物)
计算机科学
业务
环境科学
纳米技术
风险分析(工程)
废物管理
工程类
材料科学
医学
物理
内分泌学
功率(物理)
经济政策
量子力学
作者
Eleni K. Savvidou,Amanda Rensmo,Jonathan P. Benskin,Steffen Schellenberger,Xianfeng Hu,Marcel Weil,Ian T. Cousins
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c06083
摘要
The class-wide restriction proposal on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the European Union is expected to affect a wide range of commercial sectors, including the lithium-ion battery (LIB) industry, where both polymeric and low molecular weight PFAS are used. The PFAS restriction dossiers currently state that there is weak evidence for viable alternatives to the use of PFAS in LIBs. In this Perspective, we summarize both the peer-reviewed literature and expert opinions from academia and industry to verify the legitimacy of the claims surrounding the lack of alternatives. Our assessment is limited to the electrodes and electrolyte, which account for the most critical uses of PFAS in LIB cells. Companies that already offer or are developing PFAS-free electrode and electrolyte materials were identified. There are also indications that PFAS-free electrolytes are in development by at least one other company, but there is no information regarding the alternative chemistries being proposed. Our review suggests that it is technically feasible to make PFAS-free batteries for battery applications, but PFAS-free solutions are not currently well-established on the market. Successful substitution of PFAS will require an appropriate balance among battery performance, the environmental effects associated with hazardous materials and chemicals, and economic considerations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI