作者
Chengpeng Gui,Yuhang Chen,Hongwei Zhao,Jiazheng Cao,Tianjie Liu,Shengwei Xiong,Yanfei Yu,Bing Liao,Yun Cao,Jiaying Li,Kangbo Huang,Hui Han,Zhiling Zhang,Wenfang Chen,Ze-Ying Jiang,Ye Gao,Guan-Peng Han,Qi Tang,Kui Ouyang,Guimei Qu,Jitao Wu,Jianping Guo,Caixia Li,Pei-Xing Li,Zhiping Liu,Jer‐Tsong Hsieh,Muyan Cai,Xuesong Li,Jinhuan Wei,Junhang Luo
摘要
BackgroundImproved markers for predicting recurrence are needed to stratify patients with localised (stage I–III) renal cell carcinoma after surgery for selection of adjuvant therapy. We developed a novel assay integrating three modalities—clinical, genomic, and histopathological—to improve the predictive accuracy for localised renal cell carcinoma recurrence.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis and validation study, we developed a histopathological whole-slide image (WSI)-based score using deep learning allied to digital scanning of conventional haematoxylin and eosin-stained tumour tissue sections, to predict tumour recurrence in a development dataset of 651 patients with distinctly good or poor disease outcome. The six single nucleotide polymorphism-based score, which was detected in paraffin-embedded tumour tissue samples, and the Leibovich score, which was established using clinicopathological risk factors, were combined with the WSI-based score to construct a multimodal recurrence score in the training dataset of 1125 patients. The multimodal recurrence score was validated in 1625 patients from the independent validation dataset and 418 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas set. The primary outcome measured was the recurrence-free interval (RFI).FindingsThe multimodal recurrence score had significantly higher predictive accuracy than the three single-modal scores and clinicopathological risk factors, and it precisely predicted the RFI of patients in the training and two validation datasets (areas under the curve at 5 years: 0·825–0·876 vs 0·608–0·793; p<0·05). The RFI of patients with low stage or grade is usually better than that of patients with high stage or grade; however, the RFI in the multimodal recurrence score-defined high-risk stage I and II group was shorter than in the low-risk stage III group (hazard ratio [HR] 4·57, 95% CI 2·49–8·40; p<0·0001), and the RFI of the high-risk grade 1 and 2 group was shorter than in the low-risk grade 3 and 4 group (HR 4·58, 3·19–6·59; p<0·0001).InterpretationOur multimodal recurrence score is a practical and reliable predictor that can add value to the current staging system for predicting localised renal cell carcinoma recurrence after surgery, and this combined approach more precisely informs treatment decisions about adjuvant therapy.FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China, and National Key Research and Development Program of China.