How is variability in physiological responses to social stress related to punishment and reward sensitivities? Preliminary findings from the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality perspective

ABSTRACTObjective Although personality traits are assumed to have biological/physiological foundations, research has yielded mixed evidence regarding the relationship between personality and physiological stress responses. Moreover, the field has often overlooked the contemporary neuroscience-based personality approach, known as the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of Personality, in stress research.Method The present study examined the relationship between the revised RST's personality dimensions and heart rate and skin conductance level (SCL) in response to the Trier Social Stress Test in a sample of 61 healthy university students.Results Piecewise latent growth curve analysis controlling for the participants’ current life stress, smoking use, and caffeine intake revealed that individuals with higher behavioral inhibition exhibited higher physiological reactivity, whereas those with high reward sensitivity showed smaller heart rate reactivity. The behavioral disengagement facet of the behavioral inhibition scale was associated with reduced sympathetic arousal during the stress task. Additionally, reward interest was associated with a larger recovery of SCL.Conclusion Results were generally in line with the revised theory. The study findings were discussed within the paradigm of the approach-avoidance conflict and highlighted the importance of reward sensitivity in stress resilience.KEYWORDS: reinforcement sensitivitystresspersonalitypunishmentrewardbehavioural inhibition‌ AcknowledgmentThis study was not preregistered. We report how we determined our sample size, all manipulations, and all measures in the study. All data, analysis code (templates), and research materials are available at https://osf.io/n8fky/Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementsThe data obtained for this study are openly available in OSF at https://osf.io/n8fky/Ethical approvalThe study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aydın Adnan Menderes University.Permission to reproduce material from other sourcesDoes not apply.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye [grant number: 120K072].