亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Testosterone replacement in men with sexual dysfunction

勃起功能障碍 医学 睾酮(贴片) 性功能障碍 安慰剂 下尿路症状 临床试验 科克伦图书馆 随机对照试验 不利影响 内科学 妇科 前列腺 替代医学 病理 癌症
作者
Hunju Lee,Eu Chang Hwang,Cheol Kyu Oh,Solam Lee,Ho Song Yu,Jung Soo Lim,Hong Wook Kim,Thomas J. Walsh,Myung Ha Kim,Jae Hung Jung,Philipp Dahm
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2024 (1) 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd013071.pub2
摘要

Background Clinical practice guidelines recommend testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for men with sexual dysfunction and testosterone deficiency. However, TRT is commonly promoted in men without testosterone deficiency and existing trials often do not clearly report participants' testosterone levels or testosterone‐related symptoms. This review assesses the potential benefits and harms of TRT in men presenting with complaints of sexual dysfunction. Objectives To assess the effects of testosterone replacement therapy compared to placebo or other medical treatments in men with sexual dysfunction. Search methods We performed a comprehensive search of CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the trials registries ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, with no restrictions on language of publication or publication status, up to 29 August 2023. Selection criteria We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in men (40 years or over) with sexual dysfunction. We excluded men with primary or secondary hypogonadism. We compared testosterone or testosterone with phosphodiesterase‐5 inhibitors (PDEI5I) to placebo or PDE5I alone. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently screened the literature, assessed the risk of bias, extracted data, and rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to GRADE using a minimally contextualized approach. We performed statistical analyses using a random‐effects model and interpreted them according to standard Cochrane methodology. Predefined primary outcomes were self‐reported erectile dysfunction assessed by a validated instrument, sexual quality of life assessed by a validated instrument, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, prostate‐related events, and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We distinguished between short‐term (up to 12 months) and long‐term (> 12 months) outcomes. Main results We identified 43 studies with 11,419 randomized participants across three comparisons: testosterone versus placebo, testosterone versus PDE5I, and testosterone with PDE5I versus PDE5I alone. This abstract focuses on the most relevant comparison of testosterone versus placebo. Testosterone versus placebo (up to 12 months) Based on a predefined sensitivity analysis of studies at low risk of bias, and an analysis combing data from the similar International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF‐EF) and IIEF‐5 instruments, TRT likely results in little to no difference in erectile function assessed with the IIEF‐EF (mean difference (MD) 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67 to 3.08; I² = 0%; 6 RCTs, 2016 participants; moderate CoE) on a scale from 6 to 30 with larger values reflecting better erectile function. We assumed a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of greater than or equal to 4. TRT likely results in little to no change in sexual quality of life assessed with the Aging Males' Symptoms scale (MD ‐2.31, 95% CI ‐3.63 to ‐1.00; I² = 0%; 5 RCTs, 1030 participants; moderate CoE) on a scale from 17 to 85 with larger values reflecting worse sexual quality of life. We assumed a MCID of greater than or equal to 10. TRT also likely results in little to no difference in cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.26; I² = 0%; 10 RCTs, 3525 participants; moderate CoE). Based on two cardiovascular deaths in the placebo group and an assumed MCID of 3%, this would correspond to no additional deaths per 1000 men (95% CI 1 fewer to 4 more). TRT also likely results in little to no difference in treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, prostate‐related events, or LUTS. Testosterone versus placebo (later than 12 months) We are very uncertain about the longer‐term effects of TRT on erectile dysfunction assessed with the IIEF‐EF (MD 4.20, 95% CI ‐2.03 to 10.43; 1 study, 42 participants; very low CoE). We did not find studies reporting on sexual quality of life or cardiovascular mortality. We are very uncertain about the effect of testosterone on treatment withdrawal due to adverse events. We found no studies reporting on prostate‐related events or LUTS. Authors' conclusions In the short term, TRT probably has little to no effect on erectile function, sexual quality of life, or cardiovascular mortality compared to a placebo. It likely results in little to no difference in treatment withdrawals due to adverse events, prostate‐related events, or LUTS. In the long term, we are very uncertain about the effects of TRT on erectile function when compared to placebo; we did not find data on its effects on sexual quality of life or cardiovascular mortality. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate (signaling that we are confident that the reported effect size is likely to be close to the true effect) to very low (indicating that the true effect is likely to be substantially different). The findings of this review should help to inform future guidelines and clinical decision‐making at the point of care.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
苹果王子6699完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
zqq完成签到,获得积分0
28秒前
犹豫芝麻完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
灰色白面鸮完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
lab完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
ai zs发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
毛123完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
丫丫完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
陈芒果啊完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
郁乾完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
小枣完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
3分钟前
樱桃猴子应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
3分钟前
orixero应助材料虎采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
材料虎发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
何何发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
Ldq完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
李爱国应助wwwww采纳,获得10
5分钟前
传奇完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
wwwww完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
wwwww发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
5分钟前
ai zs发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
ISSN 2159-8274 EISSN 2159-8290 1000
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
Ore genesis in the Zambian Copperbelt with particular reference to the northern sector of the Chambishi basin 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3162300
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2813328
关于积分的说明 7899645
捐赠科研通 2472791
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1316517
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 631365
版权声明 602142