阅读(过程)
心理信息
阅读理解
理解力
眼球运动
考试(生物学)
心理学
眼动
意义(存在)
跟踪(教育)
数学教育
认知心理学
计算机科学
教育学
语言学
人工智能
梅德林
神经科学
心理治疗师
法学
程序设计语言
古生物学
哲学
生物
政治学
作者
Andrea M. Zawoyski,Scott P. Ardoin,Katherine S. Binder
出处
期刊:School psychology
[American Psychological Association]
日期:2023-01-01
卷期号:38 (1): 59-66
摘要
Teachers often encourage students to use test-taking strategies during reading comprehension assessments, but these strategies are not always evidence-based. One common strategy involves teaching students to read the questions before reading an associated passage. Research findings comparing the passage-first (PF) and questions-first (QF) strategies are mixed. The present study employed eye-tracking technology to record 84 third- and fourth-grade participants' eye movements (EMs) as they read a passage and responded to multiple-choice (MC) questions using PF and QF strategies in a within-subject design. Although there were no significant differences between groups in accuracy on MC questions, EM measures revealed that the PF condition was superior to the QF condition for elementary readers in terms of efficiency in reading and responding to questions. These findings suggest that the PF strategy supports a more comprehensive understanding of the text. Ultimately, within the PF condition, students required less time to obtain the same accuracy outcomes they attained when reading in the QF condition. School psychologists can improve reading comprehension instruction by encouraging the importance of teaching children to gain meaning from the text rather than search the passage for answers to MC questions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI