Evidence Synthesis as the Basis for Decision Analysis: A Method of Selecting the Best Agricultural Practices for Multiple Ecosystem Services

环境资源管理 决策分析 补贴 生态系统服务 农业 比例(比率) 最佳实践 业务 管理科学 生态系统 经济 地理 生态学 地图学 管理 数理经济学 考古 市场经济 生物
作者
Gorm E. Shackelford,Rodd Kelsey,William J. Sutherland,Christina M. Kennedy,Stephen A. Wood,Sasha Gennet,Daniel S. Karp,Claire Kremen,Nathaniel E. Seavy,Julie A. Jedlicka,Kelly Gravuer,Sara M. Kross,Déborah Bossio,Andrés Muñoz‐Sáez,Deirdre G. LaHue,Kelly Garbach,Lawrence D. Ford,Mark Felice,Mark D. Reynolds,Devii R. Rao
出处
期刊:Frontiers in sustainable food systems [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:3 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00083
摘要

Agricultural management practices have impacts not only on crops and livestock, but also on soil, water, wildlife, and ecosystem services. Agricultural research provides evidence about these impacts, but it is unclear how this evidence should be used to make decisions. Two methods are widely used in decision making: evidence synthesis and decision analysis. However, a system of evidence-based decision making that integrates these two methods has not yet been established. Moreover, the standard methods of evidence synthesis have a narrow focus (e.g., the effects of one management practice), but the standard methods of decision analysis have a wide focus (e.g., the comparative effectiveness of multiple management practices). Thus, there is a mismatch between the outputs from evidence synthesis and the inputs that are needed for decision analysis. We show how evidence for a wide range of agricultural practices can be reviewed and summarized simultaneously ("subject-wide evidence synthesis"), and how this evidence can be assessed by experts and used for decision making ("multiple-criteria decision analysis"). We show how these methods could be used by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) in California to select the best management practices for multiple ecosystem services in Mediterranean-type farmland and rangeland, based on a subject-wide evidence synthesis that was published by Conservation Evidence (www.conservationevidence.com). This method of "evidence-based decision analysis" could be used at different scales, from the local scale (farmers deciding which practices to adopt) to the national or international scale (policy makers deciding which practices to support through agricultural subsidies or other payments for ecosystem services). We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this method, and we suggest some general principles for improving evidence synthesis as the basis for multi-criteria decision analysis.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
beta完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
iNk应助qiang采纳,获得20
5秒前
srf0602.发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
南极的企鹅365完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
cns完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
benbenca完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
花痴的易真完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
善学以致用应助Ken77采纳,获得10
10秒前
sunlanglang完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
大模型应助无奈的远望采纳,获得10
12秒前
jin发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Wowowowo完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
20秒前
benbenca发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
23完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
29秒前
我爱科研科研爱我完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
Luffa完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
不安的小刺猬完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
飘逸小懒猪应助隐形书白采纳,获得10
31秒前
32秒前
33秒前
33秒前
成就的雨琴完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
谭821完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
逍遥呱呱完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
Ken77发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
左肩微笑发布了新的文献求助20
39秒前
香蕉觅云应助Yuan采纳,获得10
39秒前
39秒前
彭于晏应助浅色墨水采纳,获得10
39秒前
beta发布了新的文献求助30
40秒前
三颗板牙发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
糯米鸡完成签到,获得积分20
44秒前
46秒前
46秒前
张雷应助ZDddd采纳,获得20
47秒前
50秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 600
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3967131
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3512470
关于积分的说明 11163384
捐赠科研通 3247378
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1793799
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 874615
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804450