Evidence Synthesis as the Basis for Decision Analysis: A Method of Selecting the Best Agricultural Practices for Multiple Ecosystem Services

环境资源管理 决策分析 补贴 生态系统服务 农业 比例(比率) 最佳实践 业务 管理科学 生态系统 经济 地理 生态学 数理经济学 考古 生物 地图学 管理 市场经济
作者
Gorm E. Shackelford,Rodd Kelsey,William J. Sutherland,Christina M. Kennedy,Stephen A. Wood,Sasha Gennet,Daniel S. Karp,Claire Kremen,Nathaniel E. Seavy,Julie A. Jedlicka,Kelly Gravuer,Sara M. Kross,Déborah Bossio,Andrés Muñoz‐Sáez,Deirdre G. LaHue,Kelly Garbach,Lawrence D. Ford,Mark Felice,Mark D. Reynolds,Devii R. Rao
出处
期刊:Frontiers in sustainable food systems [Frontiers Media]
卷期号:3 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.3389/fsufs.2019.00083
摘要

Agricultural management practices have impacts not only on crops and livestock, but also on soil, water, wildlife, and ecosystem services. Agricultural research provides evidence about these impacts, but it is unclear how this evidence should be used to make decisions. Two methods are widely used in decision making: evidence synthesis and decision analysis. However, a system of evidence-based decision making that integrates these two methods has not yet been established. Moreover, the standard methods of evidence synthesis have a narrow focus (e.g., the effects of one management practice), but the standard methods of decision analysis have a wide focus (e.g., the comparative effectiveness of multiple management practices). Thus, there is a mismatch between the outputs from evidence synthesis and the inputs that are needed for decision analysis. We show how evidence for a wide range of agricultural practices can be reviewed and summarized simultaneously ("subject-wide evidence synthesis"), and how this evidence can be assessed by experts and used for decision making ("multiple-criteria decision analysis"). We show how these methods could be used by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) in California to select the best management practices for multiple ecosystem services in Mediterranean-type farmland and rangeland, based on a subject-wide evidence synthesis that was published by Conservation Evidence (www.conservationevidence.com). This method of "evidence-based decision analysis" could be used at different scales, from the local scale (farmers deciding which practices to adopt) to the national or international scale (policy makers deciding which practices to support through agricultural subsidies or other payments for ecosystem services). We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this method, and we suggest some general principles for improving evidence synthesis as the basis for multi-criteria decision analysis.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大个应助凉凉采纳,获得10
刚刚
赘婿应助明研采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
无极微光应助vera采纳,获得20
1秒前
1秒前
3秒前
3秒前
丘比特应助顾懂采纳,获得10
4秒前
qing发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
511发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
淡定的小蚂蚁应助xingzi123采纳,获得30
6秒前
7秒前
沉静的往事完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
江沅完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
海之蓝发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
ouyoha发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助qing采纳,获得10
12秒前
所所应助勤劳的雨琴采纳,获得10
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助哇哦采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
wanci应助唐艺昕采纳,获得10
13秒前
顾矜应助123456789采纳,获得100
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
docter完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
轻松二完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
小王完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
陆雪发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
sd3km完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 2000
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Earth System Geophysics 1000
Bioseparations Science and Engineering Third Edition 1000
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
BRITTLE FRACTURE IN WELDED SHIPS 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6127455
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7955129
关于积分的说明 16506625
捐赠科研通 5246406
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2802079
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1783365
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1654478