Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications

医学 超声造影 放射科 双雷达 置信区间 超声波 超声科 乳腺摄影术 诊断准确性 乳房成像 乳腺癌 内科学 癌症
作者
Meng-Fu Cheng,Wenjuan Tong,Jia Luo,M. Li,Jinyu Liang,Faming Pan,Jingxue Pan,Yanling Zheng,Xiaoyan Xie
出处
期刊:Clinical Radiology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:75 (12): 934-941 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2020.07.017
摘要

•Classifying suspicious lesions with calcifications remains a dilemma on US. •CEUS is a valuable tool in the evaluation of breast lesions with calcifications. •CEUS-BI-RADS showed better results than US on breast lesions with calcifications. •CEUS was effective in the diagnosis of isolated microcalcifications without mass. Aim To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System for Ultrasound (US-BI-RADS) 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications. Materials and methods A retrospective study of 168 breast lesions with calcifications detected on both mammography and conventional ultrasonography (US) in 152 patients were categorised as US-BI-RADS 3–4 at US between June 2009 and June 2018. CEUS scores were obtained based on a CEUS five-point scoring system. The combination of US-BI-RADS and CEUS scores created the Rerated BI-RADS (referred to as CEUS-BI-RADS). All results were compared with the histological findings. The diagnostic performances of US and CEUS-BI-RADS were compared. Results The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US were 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.6%, 92%), 85% (95% CI: 78.4%, 91.5%), and 83.9% (95% CI: 78.4%, 89.5%), respectively, while those for CEUS-BI-RADS were 98.2% (95% CI: 94.7%, 100%), 90.3% (95% CI: 84.8%, 95.7%), and 92.9% (95% CI: 89%, 96.8%), respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy values of CEUS-BI-RADS greatly improved compared with those of US (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for US and CEUS-BI-RADS were 0.888 (95% CI: 0.840, 0.936) and 0.963 (95% CI: 0.936, 0.989), respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of CEUS-BI-RADS was significantly higher than that of US alone (p=0.004). Conclusion CEUS-BI-RADS significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy for breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications compared with US. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System for Ultrasound (US-BI-RADS) 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications. A retrospective study of 168 breast lesions with calcifications detected on both mammography and conventional ultrasonography (US) in 152 patients were categorised as US-BI-RADS 3–4 at US between June 2009 and June 2018. CEUS scores were obtained based on a CEUS five-point scoring system. The combination of US-BI-RADS and CEUS scores created the Rerated BI-RADS (referred to as CEUS-BI-RADS). All results were compared with the histological findings. The diagnostic performances of US and CEUS-BI-RADS were compared. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US were 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.6%, 92%), 85% (95% CI: 78.4%, 91.5%), and 83.9% (95% CI: 78.4%, 89.5%), respectively, while those for CEUS-BI-RADS were 98.2% (95% CI: 94.7%, 100%), 90.3% (95% CI: 84.8%, 95.7%), and 92.9% (95% CI: 89%, 96.8%), respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy values of CEUS-BI-RADS greatly improved compared with those of US (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for US and CEUS-BI-RADS were 0.888 (95% CI: 0.840, 0.936) and 0.963 (95% CI: 0.936, 0.989), respectively. The diagnostic efficacy of CEUS-BI-RADS was significantly higher than that of US alone (p=0.004). CEUS-BI-RADS significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy for breast US-BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions with calcifications compared with US.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
pcr163应助linhanwenzhou采纳,获得50
刚刚
刚刚
酷酷元风完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
天才幸运鱼完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
粥游天下完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
jcc完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
哈哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
lighthouse完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
平凡中的限量版完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
大伟完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
long关注了科研通微信公众号
6秒前
懵懂的毛豆完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
zzcherished发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
zyq发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
我是老大应助哦哦哦采纳,获得10
7秒前
YHY完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
天天呼的海角完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
jiangcai完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Cherry完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
正能量的可可可完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
tuo zhang发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
草莓养乐多完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
糊涂完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
哦哦哦发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
in完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
pilot完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
劣根完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
Liang发布了新的文献求助20
23秒前
25秒前
26秒前
曾小莹完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
苏信怜完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
30秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038368
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3576068
关于积分的说明 11374313
捐赠科研通 3305780
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892672
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815029