医学
危险系数
放化疗
置信区间
内科学
食管鳞状细胞癌
临床终点
肿瘤科
放射治疗
完全响应
随机对照试验
外科
癌
胃肠病学
化疗
作者
Dong Qian,Xi Chen,Xiaobin Shang,Yuwen Wang,Peng Tang,Dong Han,Hongjing Jiang,Chuangui Chen,Gang Zhao,Dejun Zhou,Fuliang Cao,Puchun Er,Wencheng Zhang,Xiaoxia Li,Tian Zhang,Baozhong Zhang,Yong Guan,Jun Wang,Zhiyong Yuan,Zhentao Yu,Ping Wang,Qingsong Pang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.015
摘要
Background and purpose More than 40% of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) exhibit pathological complete responses (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and theoretically, these patients may be cured by CRT and omit surgery. This prospectively randomized pilot study compared definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with nCRT in patients with locally advanced ESCC who achieved clinical complete responses (cCRs) to nCRT. Materials and methods Single center, randomized, open phase 2 study of 256 patients with locally advanced ESCC enrolled between April 2016 and November 2018. Immediately when nCRT finished, patients enrolled underwent response evaluations within 1 week. Patients with cCR were randomly allocated to undergo surgery (arm A) or complete CRT up to the definitive radiation dose (arm B). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Results Finally, 71 patients were randomly assigned to the nCRT (n = 36) and dCRT (n = 35) arms. The median observation time was 35.7 months. The 3-year DFS rate was 56.43 % in arm A versus 54.73 % in arm B (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.862, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.452 to 1.645, P = 0.652). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in arms A and B were 69.5 % and 62.3 % (HR = 0.824, 95 % CI = 403–1.688, P = 0.597), respectively. Conclusions According to our treatment response evaluation criteria, survival of the patients with cCR after nCRT was not significant different between nCRT group and dCRT group. An optimized response evaluation strategy soon after nCRT may guide next therapy decisions for patients with locally advanced ESCC.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI