注意缺陷多动障碍
冲动性
判别效度
收敛有效性
心理学
临床心理学
精神科
心理测量学
内部一致性
作者
Xiuqin Wang,Princess Jane Albitos,Yong-Fu Hao,Hang Zhang,Li‐Xia Yuan,Yu‐Feng Zang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109479
摘要
Hyperactivity is one of the three core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) that is a common childhood mental disorder. Objective assessments of hyperactivity are seldom utilized compared with measures of inattention and impulsivity during clinical diagnosis and evaluation. Acceleration-sensitive devices (e.g., Actigraph) and motion tracking systems (e.g., QbTest) are two main groups of devices that can be used to objectively measure hyperactivity. The Actigraph and QbTest have good discriminant validity, convergent validity, and sensitivity to the effects of stimulants. Furthermore, the assessment setting (i.e., research laboratory, school, or home) can greatly influence the presence and severity of hyperactivity. Nevertheless, objective assessments for hyperactivity have poor ability to distinguish ADHD from other disorders, or among the three types of ADHD. Thus, further studies are needed to assess objective measurements of hyperactivity in terms of discriminant and convergent validity, test-retest reliability in different settings, and correlations with brain activity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI