Estimates of resting energy expenditure and total energy expenditure using predictive equations in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract Context Energy expenditure predictive equations can generate inaccurate estimates for overweight or obese individuals. Objective The objective of this review was to determine which predictive equations for resting energy expenditure (REE) and total energy expenditure (TEE) have the lowest bias and the highest precision in adults with overweight and obesity. Data Sources Searches were performed in January 2022 in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and the gray literature databases. Data Extraction Meta-analyses were performed with equations included in more than 1 study. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model and the I2 statistic were used to quantify heterogeneity in the quantitative analyses. The Egger test was performed to assess potential publication biases, and metaregressions were conducted to explore the heterogeneity. Findings were presented separated by participants’ body mass index classification (overweight and obesity). Data Analysis Sixty-one studies were included. The FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) equation, which uses only body weight in its formula, showed the lowest bias in estimating REE (mean difference [MD] = 8.97 kcal; 95% CI = –26.99; 44.94). In the subgroup analysis for individuals with obesity, the Lazzer (2007) equation showed the lowest bias (MD = 4.70 kcal; 95% CI = –95.45; 104.86). The Harris–Benedict equation (1919) showed the highest precision values for individuals with overweight (60.65%) and for individuals with obesity (62.54%). Equations with body composition data showed the highest biases. The equation proposed by the Institute of Medicine (2005) showed the lowest bias (MD = –2.52 kcal; 95% CI = –125.94; 120.90) in estimating the TEE. Most analyses showed high heterogeneity (I2 > 90%). There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion For individuals with overweight, the FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) and the Harris–Benedict equations (1919) showed the lowest bias and the highest precision in predicting the REE, respectively. For individuals with obesity, the Harris–Benedict equation (1919) showed the highest precision and the Lazzer equation (2007) showed the lowest bias. More studies are needed on predictive equations to estimate the TEE. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021262969.