Assessment of Undifferentiated Chest Pain in the Emergency Department (ED); an Observational Study of ED Nurse and Doctor ACS Risk Assessment and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

医学 急性冠脉综合征 急诊科 一致性 胸痛 观察研究 急诊医学 急诊分诊台 执业护士 肌钙蛋白 内科学 护理部 医疗保健 心肌梗塞 经济增长 经济
作者
Andrew G. Chapple,Anthony Chuang,Robyn Clark,Matthew Horsfall,Andrew Blyth,D. Chew,Carolyn Astley
出处
期刊:Heart Lung and Circulation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:26: S70-S70
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.061
摘要

Background: Chest pain constitutes a large proportion of Australian emergency department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is required. The aim was to measure accuracy and characteristics of clinicians assessing patients for suspected ACS and associations with outcome. Methods: A sub-analysis on 1,857 patient risk assessments was conducted from a randomised trial, comparing high-sensitivity troponin versus conventional troponin. Each participating nurse and doctor estimated the likelihood of an ACS diagnosis on their patient and recorded their professional characteristics. The primary outcome was nurse versus doctor impression of ACS in association with actual adjudicated ACS diagnosis. Concordance comparisons were conducted. Results: Six hundred and nine clinicians participated and 16% of patients were diagnosed with an ACS. There was no difference in the accuracy of ED nurses compared to doctors (C-statistic: 0.67 vs. 0.68 respectively; p = 0.35). There was minor discordance between nurse and doctor ACS-risk assessment. Nurse specialist qualification was associated with significantly higher accuracy than nurses without (65.4% vs. 55.3% respectively; p < 0.001). Consultant doctors were most accurate 138/186 (74.2%) vs. registrars 248/441 (56%) vs. residents 464/769 (60.3%) p < 0.001. Patients assessed as unlikely ACS versus definite/likely had a shorter median length of stay (4.8 h [iqr.3.2,7.9] v 5.8 h [iqr.4.1,8.0]). Conclusion: Nurses are similar to doctors in their clinical assessments, however both groups are suboptimal. Standard clinical pathways may be required to assist ED doctors and nurses to improve the assessment of suspected ACS in patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
智海瑞完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
张FY完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
爆米花应助别忘采纳,获得10
3秒前
小巧的蛋挞完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
payload完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
cdercder发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
魁梧的烧鹅完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助kk采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
安平完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
方方完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助禾禾采纳,获得10
14秒前
何柯发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
赘婿应助缓慢雅青采纳,获得10
16秒前
了了了完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
19秒前
chenlc971125完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
23秒前
Freening完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
yingzaifeixiang完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
科研通AI2S应助HH采纳,获得10
26秒前
高挑的果汁完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
Frank发布了新的文献求助100
26秒前
李爱国应助xiaoliu采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
脉动完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
美满的冬卉完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
机智店员完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
tanglu发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
_nichts发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
平淡初雪应助安平采纳,获得10
34秒前
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
晶种分解过程与铝酸钠溶液混合强度关系的探讨 8888
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6430282
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8246304
关于积分的说明 17536491
捐赠科研通 5486542
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2895837
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1872289
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1711778