Assessment of Undifferentiated Chest Pain in the Emergency Department (ED); an Observational Study of ED Nurse and Doctor ACS Risk Assessment and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

医学 急性冠脉综合征 急诊科 一致性 胸痛 观察研究 急诊医学 急诊分诊台 执业护士 肌钙蛋白 内科学 护理部 医疗保健 心肌梗塞 经济增长 经济
作者
Andrew G. Chapple,Anthony Chuang,Robyn Clark,Matthew Horsfall,Andrew Blyth,D. Chew,Carolyn Astley
出处
期刊:Heart Lung and Circulation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:26: S70-S70
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.061
摘要

Background: Chest pain constitutes a large proportion of Australian emergency department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is required. The aim was to measure accuracy and characteristics of clinicians assessing patients for suspected ACS and associations with outcome. Methods: A sub-analysis on 1,857 patient risk assessments was conducted from a randomised trial, comparing high-sensitivity troponin versus conventional troponin. Each participating nurse and doctor estimated the likelihood of an ACS diagnosis on their patient and recorded their professional characteristics. The primary outcome was nurse versus doctor impression of ACS in association with actual adjudicated ACS diagnosis. Concordance comparisons were conducted. Results: Six hundred and nine clinicians participated and 16% of patients were diagnosed with an ACS. There was no difference in the accuracy of ED nurses compared to doctors (C-statistic: 0.67 vs. 0.68 respectively; p = 0.35). There was minor discordance between nurse and doctor ACS-risk assessment. Nurse specialist qualification was associated with significantly higher accuracy than nurses without (65.4% vs. 55.3% respectively; p < 0.001). Consultant doctors were most accurate 138/186 (74.2%) vs. registrars 248/441 (56%) vs. residents 464/769 (60.3%) p < 0.001. Patients assessed as unlikely ACS versus definite/likely had a shorter median length of stay (4.8 h [iqr.3.2,7.9] v 5.8 h [iqr.4.1,8.0]). Conclusion: Nurses are similar to doctors in their clinical assessments, however both groups are suboptimal. Standard clinical pathways may be required to assist ED doctors and nurses to improve the assessment of suspected ACS in patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
晴晴完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
早日退休发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
冷傲的道罡完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
大气云朵完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
早日退休完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
小轩子发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
林lin发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
mmgf发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
14秒前
专注乐巧完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助null采纳,获得10
17秒前
CipherSage应助tt采纳,获得10
19秒前
闵笙完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
awen发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
威武千凝发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
怡然沛槐发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
Jasper应助二傻不刮痧采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
杨洋完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分20
29秒前
高天雨发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
29秒前
greenghost发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
核桃发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
深情安青应助hu111采纳,获得10
31秒前
31秒前
紫紫完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
所所应助ly普鲁卡因采纳,获得10
31秒前
林lin发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
丘比特应助凶狠的寄风采纳,获得10
34秒前
天天快乐应助zjling采纳,获得10
34秒前
紫紫发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
炙热之霜完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
星星收藏家完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
基于非线性光纤环形镜的全保偏锁模激光器研究-上海科技大学 800
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 777
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 9th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6409641
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8228870
关于积分的说明 17458760
捐赠科研通 5462599
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2886411
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1862895
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1702275