亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Assessment of Undifferentiated Chest Pain in the Emergency Department (ED); an Observational Study of ED Nurse and Doctor ACS Risk Assessment and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

医学 急性冠脉综合征 急诊科 一致性 胸痛 观察研究 急诊医学 急诊分诊台 执业护士 肌钙蛋白 内科学 护理部 医疗保健 心肌梗塞 经济增长 经济
作者
Andrew G. Chapple,Anthony Chuang,Robyn Clark,Matthew Horsfall,Andrew Blyth,D. Chew,Carolyn Astley
出处
期刊:Heart Lung and Circulation [Elsevier]
卷期号:26: S70-S70
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.061
摘要

Background: Chest pain constitutes a large proportion of Australian emergency department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is required. The aim was to measure accuracy and characteristics of clinicians assessing patients for suspected ACS and associations with outcome. Methods: A sub-analysis on 1,857 patient risk assessments was conducted from a randomised trial, comparing high-sensitivity troponin versus conventional troponin. Each participating nurse and doctor estimated the likelihood of an ACS diagnosis on their patient and recorded their professional characteristics. The primary outcome was nurse versus doctor impression of ACS in association with actual adjudicated ACS diagnosis. Concordance comparisons were conducted. Results: Six hundred and nine clinicians participated and 16% of patients were diagnosed with an ACS. There was no difference in the accuracy of ED nurses compared to doctors (C-statistic: 0.67 vs. 0.68 respectively; p = 0.35). There was minor discordance between nurse and doctor ACS-risk assessment. Nurse specialist qualification was associated with significantly higher accuracy than nurses without (65.4% vs. 55.3% respectively; p < 0.001). Consultant doctors were most accurate 138/186 (74.2%) vs. registrars 248/441 (56%) vs. residents 464/769 (60.3%) p < 0.001. Patients assessed as unlikely ACS versus definite/likely had a shorter median length of stay (4.8 h [iqr.3.2,7.9] v 5.8 h [iqr.4.1,8.0]). Conclusion: Nurses are similar to doctors in their clinical assessments, however both groups are suboptimal. Standard clinical pathways may be required to assist ED doctors and nurses to improve the assessment of suspected ACS in patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
6秒前
7秒前
迅速初柳发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Alberat发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
14秒前
小二郎应助迅速初柳采纳,获得10
16秒前
20秒前
悦耳青梦发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
卷毛维安完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
迷路的沛芹完成签到 ,获得积分0
25秒前
27秒前
丁一发布了新的文献求助20
27秒前
科研通AI6.1应助LucyMartinez采纳,获得10
30秒前
Meyako完成签到 ,获得积分0
32秒前
33秒前
Jasper应助悦耳青梦采纳,获得10
33秒前
LucyMartinez完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
韦鑫龙完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
LG应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
41秒前
null应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
null应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
null应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
快乐若云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
null应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
null应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
41秒前
null应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
LG应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
42秒前
null应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
42秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
42秒前
LucyMartinez发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
Ping完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
45秒前
46秒前
龙猫抱枕完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
50秒前
英俊的未来完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 40000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5746460
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5434797
关于积分的说明 15355420
捐赠科研通 4886401
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2627238
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1575707
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1532471