亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comment on “ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About Colonoscopy”

结肠镜检查 保证 考试(生物学) 医学 质量(理念) 病人护理 梅德林 医疗保健 医学教育 心理学 内科学 护理部 结直肠癌 古生物学 经济 法学 哲学 癌症 认识论 金融经济学 生物 经济增长 政治学
作者
Qiqi Wu
出处
期刊:Gastroenterology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:166 (1): 219-220 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.030
摘要

I read with great interest the recent article in Gastroenterology by Lee et al1Lee T.-C. et al.Gastroenterology. 2023; 165: 509-511.e7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar that aimed to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT to provide satisfactory answers to common patient questions about colonoscopy. As artificial intelligence systems like ChatGPT become more prevalent in health care, it is crucial that we critically evaluate their capabilities and limitations. The authors' findings that ChatGPT can provide responses comparable with traditional medical resources in understandability, adequacy, and satisfaction ratings are important initial validations. However, several limitations and perspectives deserve further discussion before integrating ChatGPT into clinical use. First, the study evaluated only 8 common questions retrieved from 3 hospital websites. Expanding the sample size and diversity of questions could provide more robust results. Because patient questions often focus on procedural expectations, quality of life impact, and cost concerns, evaluating ChatGPT's performance on these topics will offer additional clinically useful insights. Second, the responses generated by ChatGPT bypass the clinical reasoning involved in providing personalized recommendations, which considers patients' medical history and test results. Third, the lack of patient raters is an important limitation, as acknowledged by the authors. Including patient perspectives would more authentically assess the utility of artificial intelligence–generated medical information from the end-user standpoint. Qualitative feedback could reveal nuances not captured by quantitative ratings. Furthermore, ethical implications of reliance on ChatGPT for clinical use also warrant consideration.2Rahimzadeh V. et al.Am J Bioeth. 2023; 23: 1-11Google Scholar Despite the limitations, the insights gained from this study open up avenues for impactful work in the near future, which deserve more attention. Looking ahead, an exciting area for further exploration is training domain-specific models like 'MedGPT.' Retraining ChatGPT on a clinical corpus could potentially enhance the accuracy, readability, and bedside manner of responses. Collaborations with patients to co-design prompts and grading rubrics would uphold patient-centered principles. Moreover, evaluating the integration of ChatGPT into electronic health records could facilitate seamless clinical application. With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, there is substantial promise in leveraging these tools to enhance patient education and foster collaborative decision-making, if implemented under strict clinical oversight and guidance. In this regard, the work by Lee et al1Lee T.-C. et al.Gastroenterology. 2023; 165: 509-511.e7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar has opened an insightful avenue for future research. In summary, although Lee et al provide early data on an innovative concept, expanding the scope and methodology could offer more comprehensive insights to realize the full potential of ChatGPT in patient education and other promising clinical areas. ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About ColonoscopyGastroenterologyVol. 165Issue 2PreviewChatGPT (OpenAI) is a 175 billion–parameter large language model (LLM) artificial intelligence (AI) that was released in November 2022. ChatGPT is developed based on the generative pretrained transformer (GPT) 3.5 natural language processing technology and provides a conversational text response to a given prompt.1 Full-Text PDF Open AccessReplyGastroenterologyVol. 166Issue 1PreviewWe appreciate the comments by Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit,1 Wu,2 and Tariq et al3 about our article.4 We agree with these valuable comments, which point out the importance of physician oversight, patient involvement, integration of evidence-based medicine, and patient-specific information to the optimal design and use of conversational artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for shared decision making and for communication between patients and health care providers. Full-Text PDF
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
持卿应助CHENHL采纳,获得50
4秒前
夏虫语冰完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
9秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
ceeray23发布了新的文献求助20
19秒前
太阳啊发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
xiuxiu完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
打打应助成就的行云采纳,获得10
20秒前
23秒前
esyncoms完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
大模型应助太阳啊采纳,获得10
30秒前
dada完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
42秒前
合一海盗完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
醉书生应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
醉书生应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
45秒前
mmmmk发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
科研通AI5应助Lu_ckilly采纳,获得10
52秒前
59秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Lu_ckilly发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
lalala完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
邓力发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
小付完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
02发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科研通AI5应助硕小牛采纳,获得10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
程程发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
ALUMINUM STANDARDS AND DATA 500
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3666287
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3225351
关于积分的说明 9762737
捐赠科研通 2935243
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1607522
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 759252
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735185