Comment on “ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About Colonoscopy”

结肠镜检查 保证 考试(生物学) 医学 质量(理念) 病人护理 梅德林 医疗保健 医学教育 心理学 内科学 护理部 结直肠癌 古生物学 经济 法学 哲学 癌症 认识论 金融经济学 生物 经济增长 政治学
作者
Qiqi Wu
出处
期刊:Gastroenterology [Elsevier]
卷期号:166 (1): 219-220 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2023.08.030
摘要

I read with great interest the recent article in Gastroenterology by Lee et al1Lee T.-C. et al.Gastroenterology. 2023; 165: 509-511.e7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar that aimed to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT to provide satisfactory answers to common patient questions about colonoscopy. As artificial intelligence systems like ChatGPT become more prevalent in health care, it is crucial that we critically evaluate their capabilities and limitations. The authors' findings that ChatGPT can provide responses comparable with traditional medical resources in understandability, adequacy, and satisfaction ratings are important initial validations. However, several limitations and perspectives deserve further discussion before integrating ChatGPT into clinical use. First, the study evaluated only 8 common questions retrieved from 3 hospital websites. Expanding the sample size and diversity of questions could provide more robust results. Because patient questions often focus on procedural expectations, quality of life impact, and cost concerns, evaluating ChatGPT's performance on these topics will offer additional clinically useful insights. Second, the responses generated by ChatGPT bypass the clinical reasoning involved in providing personalized recommendations, which considers patients' medical history and test results. Third, the lack of patient raters is an important limitation, as acknowledged by the authors. Including patient perspectives would more authentically assess the utility of artificial intelligence–generated medical information from the end-user standpoint. Qualitative feedback could reveal nuances not captured by quantitative ratings. Furthermore, ethical implications of reliance on ChatGPT for clinical use also warrant consideration.2Rahimzadeh V. et al.Am J Bioeth. 2023; 23: 1-11Google Scholar Despite the limitations, the insights gained from this study open up avenues for impactful work in the near future, which deserve more attention. Looking ahead, an exciting area for further exploration is training domain-specific models like 'MedGPT.' Retraining ChatGPT on a clinical corpus could potentially enhance the accuracy, readability, and bedside manner of responses. Collaborations with patients to co-design prompts and grading rubrics would uphold patient-centered principles. Moreover, evaluating the integration of ChatGPT into electronic health records could facilitate seamless clinical application. With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, there is substantial promise in leveraging these tools to enhance patient education and foster collaborative decision-making, if implemented under strict clinical oversight and guidance. In this regard, the work by Lee et al1Lee T.-C. et al.Gastroenterology. 2023; 165: 509-511.e7Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar has opened an insightful avenue for future research. In summary, although Lee et al provide early data on an innovative concept, expanding the scope and methodology could offer more comprehensive insights to realize the full potential of ChatGPT in patient education and other promising clinical areas. ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About ColonoscopyGastroenterologyVol. 165Issue 2PreviewChatGPT (OpenAI) is a 175 billion–parameter large language model (LLM) artificial intelligence (AI) that was released in November 2022. ChatGPT is developed based on the generative pretrained transformer (GPT) 3.5 natural language processing technology and provides a conversational text response to a given prompt.1 Full-Text PDF Open AccessReplyGastroenterologyVol. 166Issue 1PreviewWe appreciate the comments by Kleebayoon and Wiwanitkit,1 Wu,2 and Tariq et al3 about our article.4 We agree with these valuable comments, which point out the importance of physician oversight, patient involvement, integration of evidence-based medicine, and patient-specific information to the optimal design and use of conversational artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for shared decision making and for communication between patients and health care providers. Full-Text PDF

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
qz发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
leolee完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
爆米花应助友好的哈密瓜采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
3321发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Owen应助陶醉的手套采纳,获得10
6秒前
Hello应助penny0000采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
jawa完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
酷波er应助明亮的嚣采纳,获得10
9秒前
EMC应助momokop采纳,获得10
10秒前
Panda完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
xxy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
leolee完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
所所应助lz4540采纳,获得10
14秒前
CipherSage应助3321采纳,获得10
15秒前
weikq2001发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
内向书雁发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
Owen应助HRZ采纳,获得10
23秒前
英俊的铭应助younger采纳,获得10
23秒前
YY发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
小蘑菇应助bji采纳,获得10
26秒前
明亮的嚣发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
77发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
Hank完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
joe55667788发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
Stefani发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
PrisTon完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
科研通AI6.1应助内向书雁采纳,获得30
32秒前
CodeCraft应助糯米糍采纳,获得10
32秒前
酷波er应助糯米糍采纳,获得10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Brittle Fracture in Welded Ships 500
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5941848
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7065110
关于积分的说明 15886859
捐赠科研通 5072261
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2728391
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1686998
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1613261