作者
Guohua Zeng,Wen Zhong,Giorgio Mazzon,Wei Zhu,S. Lahme,Sanjay Khadgi,Janak Desai,Madhu Agrawal,David A. Schulsinger,Mantu Gupta,E. Montanari,J. Martı́nez,Shabir Al‐Mousawi,Vincent Emanuel F. Malonzo,Seshadri Sriprasad,Otaš Durutović,Vimoshan Arumuham,Stefania Ferretti,Wissam Kamal,Kewei Xu,Fan Cheng,Xiaofeng Gao,Jiwen Cheng,Bhaskar K. Somani,Mordechai Duvdevani,Kah Ann,Christian Seitz,Norberto Bernardo,Tarek Ibrahim,Albert Aquino,Takahiro Yasui,Cristian Fiori,Thomas Knoll,Athanasios Papatsoris,Nariman Gadzhiev,Ulanbek Zhanbyrbekuly,Oriol Angerri,Hugo López‐Ramos,Iliya Saltirov,Mohamad Moussa,Guido Giusti,Fábio C. Vicentini,Edgar Beltrán Suárez,Margaret S. Pearle,Glenn M. Preminger,Qinghui Wu,Otaš Durutović,Khurshid R. Ghani,Marcus Vinícius Osorio Maroccolo,Marianne Brehmer,Palle Jørn Sloth Osther,Marek Zawadzki,Azimdjon N. Tursunkulov,Monolov Nurbek Kytaibekovich,Abdusamad Abdukakhorovich Abuvohidov,C. Lara,Zamari Noori,S.P. Zanetti,Sunil Shrestha,Jean de la Rosette,John D. Denstedt,Shouxin Zhang,Kemal Sarıca,Simon Choong
摘要
Abstract Over the past three decades, there has been increasing interest in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) techniques featuring smaller tracts as they offer potential solutions to mitigate complications associated with standard PCNL (sPCNL). However, despite this growing acceptance and recognition of its benefits, unresolved controversies and acknowledged limitations continue to impede widespread adoption due to a lack of consensus on optimal perioperative management strategies and procedural tips and tricks. In response to these challenges, an international panel comprising experts from the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) took on the task of compiling an expert consensus document on mPCNL procedures aimed at providing urologists with a comprehensive clinical framework for practice. This endeavor involved conducting a systematic literature review to identify research gaps (RGs), which formed the foundation for developing a structured questionnaire survey. Subsequently, a two-round modified Delphi survey was implemented, culminating in a group meeting to generate final evidence-based comments. All 64 experts completed the second-round survey, resulting in a response rate of 100.0%. Fifty-eight key questions were raised focusing on mPCNLs within 4 main domains, including general information (13 questions), preoperative work-up (13 questions), procedural tips and tricks (19 questions), and postoperative evaluation and follow-up (13 questions). Additionally, 9 questions evaluated the experts’ experience with PCNLs. Consensus was reached on 30 questions after the second-round survey, while professional statements for the remaining 28 key questions were provided after discussion in an online panel meeting. mPCNL, characterized by a tract smaller than 18 Fr and an innovative lithotripsy technique, has firmly established itself as a viable and effective approach for managing upper urinary tract stones in both adults and pediatrics. It offers several advantages over sPCNL including reduced bleeding, fewer requirements for nephrostomy tubes, decreased pain, and shorter hospital stays. The series of detailed techniques presented here serve as a comprehensive guide for urologists, aiming to improve their procedural understanding and optimize patient outcomes.