Weekly Journal Scan: A reassuring answer to questions about statin therapy and diabetes

医学 糖尿病 他汀类 安慰剂 内科学 不利影响 随机对照试验 养生 糖化血红蛋白 2型糖尿病 物理疗法 内分泌学 替代医学 病理
作者
Daniela Pedicino,Massimo Volpe
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:45 (41): 4449-4450
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae486
摘要

Key Points• In this meta-analysis of individual participant data from 23 double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) participating in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration, the authors sought to investigate the effects of statin therapy allocation on new-onset diabetes and on worsening glycaemia in patients with diabetes.• Eligibility criteria for RCTs were as follows: (i) no protocol-mandated differences between treatment groups other than those created by allocation to receive statin and its comparator (placebo or a statin with different intensity); (ii) at least 1000 patients enrolled; and (iii) a mean scheduled follow-up of at least 2 years.• Baseline diabetes was defined as a recorded history of diabetes or diabetes-related adverse event, use of glucose-lowering medications, fasting plasma glucose concentration ≥7 mmol/L, random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L, or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value ≥6.5% on or before the date of participant assignment to a treatment group.New-onset diabetes was defined with the above-mentioned characteristics recorded after participant assignment to a treatment group.Worsening glycaemia was defined as any adverse event relating to ketosis or glucose control, HbA1c increase from baseline of ≥0.5%, or escalation of glucose-lowering medications after participant assignment to a treatment group.• Of the included RCTs, 19 compared any statin regimen with placebo, with 123 940 participants, a median follow-up of 4 years, and 25 701 subjects (21%) with a history of diabetes or meeting the prespecified definition of baseline diabetes.In the analysis of the RCTs comparing low-or moderate-intensity statin vs. placebo (n = 14), the allocation to statin treatment resulted in a 10% increase in new-onset diabetes [2420 of 39 179 participants in the statin group vs. 2214 of 39 266 participants assigned to placebo; relative risk (RR), 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.16],corresponding to an incidence of 1.3% per year compared to 1.2% in the placebo group, with a mean absolute excess of 0.12% during each year of treatment.Those treated with a high-intensity statin (two RCTs) had a larger, 36% proportional increase in newonset diabetes (1221 of 9935 participants in the statin group vs. 905 of 9859 participants assigned to placebo; RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.48),with rates of 4.8% vs. 3.5% per year and an absolute annual excess of 1.27%.Of note, in the high-intensity statin trials, HbA1c and glucose levels were measured in 72% and 49% of participants without diabetes at baseline vs. 3% and 37% of those in the low-or moderate-intensity statin trials.• In the 4 RCTs comparing more vs.less intensive statin therapy (30 724 participants, 17% with diabetes, median follow-up of 5 years), highintensity regimens resulted in a 10% increase in newly diagnosed diabetes (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18).For a given level of statin intensity, the results were consistent among participant subgroups (e.g. by age, sex, race, and body mass index) and did not vary over time.Among patients without diabetes at baseline, the mean increase in glucose concentration compared with placebo was 0.04 mmol/L for both low-or moderateintensity and high-intensity statin therapy, and the increases in HbA1c values were 0.06% for low-or moderate-intensity and 0.08% for highintensity statin therapy.Up to 62% of new-onset diabetes occurred among participants in the highest quartiles of glycaemia distribution.• In those with pre-existing diabetes, low-or moderate-intensity statins resulted in a 10% relative increased risk of worsening glycaemia compared with placebo (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14;absolute annual excess 1.49%), and high-intensity statins resulted in a 24% relative worsening of glycaemia compared with placebo (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44;absolute annual excess 3.02%).The mean increase in glucose concentration compared with placebo was 0.12 mmol/L for low-or moderate-intensity statin therapy and 0.22 mmol/L for high-intensity statin therapy, with a corresponding increase in HbA1c values of 0.09% for low-or moderate-intensity and 0.24% for high-intensity statin therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
于yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
文献一搜就出完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Wdd完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zxcharm完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
小成完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
周杰伦啦啦完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
静静完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
高贵的迎蕾完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
莫莫完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
云痴子发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
萧水白完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
空隙可欣完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
縤雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
JG完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
香雪若梅完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
牛哇ccc发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
果粒陈完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
大力道罡完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
养鸟的人完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
zzzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
牛哇ccc完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
luoqin完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
36秒前
手握灵珠常奋笔完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
bushi完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
不能吃太饱完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
Eden完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
科研通AI6应助ZJU采纳,获得10
44秒前
嘻嘻哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分0
49秒前
zzz完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
久伴久爱完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
Peter完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
XM完成签到,获得积分10
54秒前
橘子完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
panpanliumin完成签到,获得积分0
57秒前
58秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5599928
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4685747
关于积分的说明 14839041
捐赠科研通 4674223
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2538431
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1505597
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471086