Weekly Journal Scan: A reassuring answer to questions about statin therapy and diabetes

医学 糖尿病 他汀类 安慰剂 内科学 不利影响 随机对照试验 养生 糖化血红蛋白 2型糖尿病 物理疗法 内分泌学 替代医学 病理
作者
Daniela Pedicino,Massimo Volpe
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:45 (41): 4449-4450
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae486
摘要

Key Points• In this meta-analysis of individual participant data from 23 double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) participating in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration, the authors sought to investigate the effects of statin therapy allocation on new-onset diabetes and on worsening glycaemia in patients with diabetes.• Eligibility criteria for RCTs were as follows: (i) no protocol-mandated differences between treatment groups other than those created by allocation to receive statin and its comparator (placebo or a statin with different intensity); (ii) at least 1000 patients enrolled; and (iii) a mean scheduled follow-up of at least 2 years.• Baseline diabetes was defined as a recorded history of diabetes or diabetes-related adverse event, use of glucose-lowering medications, fasting plasma glucose concentration ≥7 mmol/L, random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L, or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value ≥6.5% on or before the date of participant assignment to a treatment group.New-onset diabetes was defined with the above-mentioned characteristics recorded after participant assignment to a treatment group.Worsening glycaemia was defined as any adverse event relating to ketosis or glucose control, HbA1c increase from baseline of ≥0.5%, or escalation of glucose-lowering medications after participant assignment to a treatment group.• Of the included RCTs, 19 compared any statin regimen with placebo, with 123 940 participants, a median follow-up of 4 years, and 25 701 subjects (21%) with a history of diabetes or meeting the prespecified definition of baseline diabetes.In the analysis of the RCTs comparing low-or moderate-intensity statin vs. placebo (n = 14), the allocation to statin treatment resulted in a 10% increase in new-onset diabetes [2420 of 39 179 participants in the statin group vs. 2214 of 39 266 participants assigned to placebo; relative risk (RR), 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.16],corresponding to an incidence of 1.3% per year compared to 1.2% in the placebo group, with a mean absolute excess of 0.12% during each year of treatment.Those treated with a high-intensity statin (two RCTs) had a larger, 36% proportional increase in newonset diabetes (1221 of 9935 participants in the statin group vs. 905 of 9859 participants assigned to placebo; RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.48),with rates of 4.8% vs. 3.5% per year and an absolute annual excess of 1.27%.Of note, in the high-intensity statin trials, HbA1c and glucose levels were measured in 72% and 49% of participants without diabetes at baseline vs. 3% and 37% of those in the low-or moderate-intensity statin trials.• In the 4 RCTs comparing more vs.less intensive statin therapy (30 724 participants, 17% with diabetes, median follow-up of 5 years), highintensity regimens resulted in a 10% increase in newly diagnosed diabetes (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18).For a given level of statin intensity, the results were consistent among participant subgroups (e.g. by age, sex, race, and body mass index) and did not vary over time.Among patients without diabetes at baseline, the mean increase in glucose concentration compared with placebo was 0.04 mmol/L for both low-or moderateintensity and high-intensity statin therapy, and the increases in HbA1c values were 0.06% for low-or moderate-intensity and 0.08% for highintensity statin therapy.Up to 62% of new-onset diabetes occurred among participants in the highest quartiles of glycaemia distribution.• In those with pre-existing diabetes, low-or moderate-intensity statins resulted in a 10% relative increased risk of worsening glycaemia compared with placebo (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14;absolute annual excess 1.49%), and high-intensity statins resulted in a 24% relative worsening of glycaemia compared with placebo (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44;absolute annual excess 3.02%).The mean increase in glucose concentration compared with placebo was 0.12 mmol/L for low-or moderate-intensity statin therapy and 0.22 mmol/L for high-intensity statin therapy, with a corresponding increase in HbA1c values of 0.09% for low-or moderate-intensity and 0.24% for high-intensity statin therapy.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
易佳发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
田様应助西格采纳,获得50
2秒前
odell发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
5秒前
h3rry驳回了Orange应助
6秒前
odell完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
左白易完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
xiaoxuesheng发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
parallel完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
晨晨学长完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI6应助叶弥采纳,获得10
11秒前
lh发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
13秒前
parallel发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
hananq发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
一川完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
晨晨学长发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助50
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
jimmyhui完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
蒋蒋蒋发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
hananq完成签到,获得积分20
21秒前
点点点发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
LaTeXer应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
22秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
科研牛马应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Feigin and Cherry's Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Ninth Edition 2024 4000
Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 1000
青少年心理适应性量表(APAS)使用手册 700
Air Transportation A Global Management Perspective 9th Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5003151
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4248042
关于积分的说明 13235023
捐赠科研通 4046979
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2214109
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1224180
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1144425