Weekly Journal Scan: A reassuring answer to questions about statin therapy and diabetes

医学 糖尿病 他汀类 安慰剂 内科学 不利影响 随机对照试验 养生 糖化血红蛋白 2型糖尿病 物理疗法 内分泌学 替代医学 病理
作者
Daniela Pedicino,Massimo Volpe
出处
期刊:European Heart Journal [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:45 (41): 4449-4450
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae486
摘要

Key Points• In this meta-analysis of individual participant data from 23 double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) participating in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration, the authors sought to investigate the effects of statin therapy allocation on new-onset diabetes and on worsening glycaemia in patients with diabetes.• Eligibility criteria for RCTs were as follows: (i) no protocol-mandated differences between treatment groups other than those created by allocation to receive statin and its comparator (placebo or a statin with different intensity); (ii) at least 1000 patients enrolled; and (iii) a mean scheduled follow-up of at least 2 years.• Baseline diabetes was defined as a recorded history of diabetes or diabetes-related adverse event, use of glucose-lowering medications, fasting plasma glucose concentration ≥7 mmol/L, random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L, or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value ≥6.5% on or before the date of participant assignment to a treatment group.New-onset diabetes was defined with the above-mentioned characteristics recorded after participant assignment to a treatment group.Worsening glycaemia was defined as any adverse event relating to ketosis or glucose control, HbA1c increase from baseline of ≥0.5%, or escalation of glucose-lowering medications after participant assignment to a treatment group.• Of the included RCTs, 19 compared any statin regimen with placebo, with 123 940 participants, a median follow-up of 4 years, and 25 701 subjects (21%) with a history of diabetes or meeting the prespecified definition of baseline diabetes.In the analysis of the RCTs comparing low-or moderate-intensity statin vs. placebo (n = 14), the allocation to statin treatment resulted in a 10% increase in new-onset diabetes [2420 of 39 179 participants in the statin group vs. 2214 of 39 266 participants assigned to placebo; relative risk (RR), 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.16],corresponding to an incidence of 1.3% per year compared to 1.2% in the placebo group, with a mean absolute excess of 0.12% during each year of treatment.Those treated with a high-intensity statin (two RCTs) had a larger, 36% proportional increase in newonset diabetes (1221 of 9935 participants in the statin group vs. 905 of 9859 participants assigned to placebo; RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.48),with rates of 4.8% vs. 3.5% per year and an absolute annual excess of 1.27%.Of note, in the high-intensity statin trials, HbA1c and glucose levels were measured in 72% and 49% of participants without diabetes at baseline vs. 3% and 37% of those in the low-or moderate-intensity statin trials.• In the 4 RCTs comparing more vs.less intensive statin therapy (30 724 participants, 17% with diabetes, median follow-up of 5 years), highintensity regimens resulted in a 10% increase in newly diagnosed diabetes (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18).For a given level of statin intensity, the results were consistent among participant subgroups (e.g. by age, sex, race, and body mass index) and did not vary over time.Among patients without diabetes at baseline, the mean increase in glucose concentration compared with placebo was 0.04 mmol/L for both low-or moderateintensity and high-intensity statin therapy, and the increases in HbA1c values were 0.06% for low-or moderate-intensity and 0.08% for highintensity statin therapy.Up to 62% of new-onset diabetes occurred among participants in the highest quartiles of glycaemia distribution.• In those with pre-existing diabetes, low-or moderate-intensity statins resulted in a 10% relative increased risk of worsening glycaemia compared with placebo (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14;absolute annual excess 1.49%), and high-intensity statins resulted in a 24% relative worsening of glycaemia compared with placebo (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44;absolute annual excess 3.02%).The mean increase in glucose concentration compared with placebo was 0.12 mmol/L for low-or moderate-intensity statin therapy and 0.22 mmol/L for high-intensity statin therapy, with a corresponding increase in HbA1c values of 0.09% for low-or moderate-intensity and 0.24% for high-intensity statin therapy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
冲冲完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
1秒前
充电宝应助foregan采纳,获得10
1秒前
小蘑菇应助kepwake采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6应助娇气的芷巧采纳,获得10
3秒前
shiyin发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
沉静乾完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
计划明天炸地球完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
佘余发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
牧夜白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
冲冲发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
壮观听白完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
大钱哥发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
FashionBoy应助专注采枫采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
iamzhangly30hyit完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
tengfei完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
英姑应助chen采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
正直芫发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
瞿绝悟完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
SciGPT应助合适的幻然采纳,获得10
13秒前
羊羊发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
路宝淇发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
kepwake发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
大钱哥完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
南风发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Orange应助沉静幼荷采纳,获得10
16秒前
yaya完成签到 ,获得积分0
17秒前
llllll完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
任性的沅完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
20秒前
鱼鱼发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 8000
Comprehensive Methanol Science Production, Applications, and Emerging Technologies 2000
From Victimization to Aggression 1000
Translanguaging in Action in English-Medium Classrooms: A Resource Book for Teachers 700
Exosomes Pipeline Insight, 2025 500
Red Book: 2024–2027 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5652998
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4789083
关于积分的说明 15062620
捐赠科研通 4811651
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2574020
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1529772
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1488418