Comparative Outcomes of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Laterally Spreading Lesions in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: The role of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial despite its effectiveness in the general population. We aim to characterize outcomes of EMR for IBD-associated LSLs compared to controls without IBD. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with IBD who underwent EMR and endoscopic follow-up for LSLs, compared to a control group without IBD. The primary outcome was histologic recurrence; secondary outcomes included en bloc resection and adverse events. Factors associated with recurrence were identified using multivariate mixed effects logistic regression. Results: A total of 210 pre-malignant lesions in 155 patients were included. By histology, 91% were adenoma/low-grade dysplasia or sessile serrated lesions. Average lesion size was 22.9 mm (SD 11.3 mm) in the IBD group, and 21.5 mm (SD 12.4 mm) in the control group. Recurrence occurred in 30.4% of IBD-associated lesions (7/23) compared to 20.9% of controls (39/187; OR=2.51, CI .59-10.71). En bloc resection was less common in the IBD group (2/23, 8.7%, 95% CI 1.1-28.0) versus controls (106/187, 57.9%, 95% CI 50.4-65.2). After adjusting for lesion size and histology, recurrence appeared more common in patients with IBD compared to controls (OR=3.08, 95% CI 1.04-9.13). Conclusions: Recurrence of LSLs after EMR appears more frequent in patients with IBD. Given the added complexity, EMR in patients with IBD should be performed in expert centers with close endoscopic surveillance.