医学
优势比
人口
置信区间
视力障碍
可能性
医疗补助
人口学
视力
逻辑回归
眼科
医疗保健
内科学
环境卫生
精神科
社会学
经济
经济增长
作者
Arthur Brant,Natasha Nayak Kolomeyer,Jeffrey L. Goldberg,Julia A. Haller,Cecilia S. Lee,Aaron Lee,Anja Lorch,Flora Lum,Joan W. Miller,David W. Parke,Leslie Hyman,Suzann Pershing
出处
期刊:Ophthalmology
[Elsevier]
日期:2023-11-01
卷期号:130 (11): 1121-1137
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.06.011
摘要
To evaluate associations of patient characteristics with United States eye care use and likelihood of blindness.Retrospective observational study.Patients (19 546 016) with 2018 visual acuity (VA) records in the American Academy of Ophthalmology's IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).Legal blindness (20/200 or worse) and visual impairment (VI; worse than 20/40) were identified from corrected distance acuity in the better-seeing eye and stratified by patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations with blindness and VI. Blindness was mapped by state and compared with population characteristics. Eye care use was analyzed by comparing population demographics with United States Census estimates and proportional demographic representation among blind patients versus a nationally representative US population sample (National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey [NHANES]).Prevalence and odds ratios for VI and blindness; proportional representation in the IRIS® Registry, Census, and NHANES by patient demographics.Visual impairment was present in 6.98% (n = 1 364 935) and blindness in 0.98% (n = 190 817) of IRIS patients. Adjusted odds of blindness were highest among patients ≥ 85 years old (odds ratio [OR], 11.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.33-13.59 vs. those 0-17 years old). Blindness also was associated positively with rural location and Medicaid, Medicare, or no insurance vs. commercial insurance. Hispanic (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.46-1.74) and Black (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.63-1.84) patients showed a higher odds of blindness versus White non-Hispanic patients. Proportional representation in IRIS Registry relative to the Census was higher for White than Hispanic (2- to 4-fold) or Black (11%-85%) patients (P < 0.001). Blindness overall was less prevalent in NHANES than IRIS Registry; however, prevalence in adults aged 60+ was lowest among Black participants in the NHANES (0.54%) and second highest among comparable Black adults in IRIS (1.57%).Legal blindness from low VA was present in 0.98% of IRIS patients and associated with rural location, public or no insurance, and older age. Compared with US Census estimates, minorities may be underrepresented among ophthalmology patients, and compared with NHANES population estimates, Black individuals may be overrepresented among blind IRIS Registry patients. These findings provide a snapshot of US ophthalmic care and highlight the need for initiatives to address disparities in use and blindness.Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI