医学
肝细胞癌
内科学
肝移植
肝硬化
胃肠病学
队列
回顾性队列研究
辅助治疗
比例危险模型
胆红素
经导管动脉化疗栓塞
多元分析
米兰标准
肝癌
外科
移植
癌症
作者
Juxian Sun,Hongming Yu,Jie Shi,Jiayi Wu,Zhe Yang,Wei Ma,Shusen Zheng,Shuqun Cheng
出处
期刊:Hpb
[Elsevier]
日期:2024-02-01
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.007
摘要
Background The prognosis of HCC patients without MVI (so called M0) is highly heterogeneous and the need for adjuvant therapy is still controversial. Methods Patients with HCC with M0 who underwent liver resection (LR) or liver transplantation (LT) as an initial therapy were included. The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH)-M0 score was developed from a retrospective cohort to form the training cohort. The classification which was developed using multivariate cox regression analysis was externally validated. Results The score was developed using the following factors: α-fetoprotein level, tumour diameter, liver cirrhosis, total bilirubin, albumin and aspartate aminotransferase. The score differentiated two groups of M0 patients (≤3, >3 points) with distinct long-term prognoses outcomes (median overall survival (OS), 98.0 vs. 46.0 months; p < 0.001). The predictive accuracy of the score was greater than the other commonly used staging systems for HCC. And for M0 patients with a higher score underwent LR. Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was effective to prolong OS. Conclusions The EHBH M0 scoring system was more accurate in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients with M0 after LR or LT. Adjuvant therapy is recommended for HCC patients who have a higher score.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI