心理学
乐观 主义
心理干预
背景(考古学)
随机对照试验
心情
情感(语言学)
临床心理学
心理健康
发展心理学
社会心理学
精神科
医学
生物
外科
古生物学
沟通
作者
Samuel Tomczyk,Lennart Marlinghaus,Silke Schmidt,Sándor Bartha
出处
期刊:The Journal of Positive Psychology
日期:2023-12-24
卷期号:19 (6): 1080-1090
标识
DOI:10.1080/17439760.2023.2297213
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has tremendous impact on public mental health and on psychological resources such as optimism. In this context, positive psychological interventions like the best possible self (BPS) intervention may be useful tools for resource activation. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial, conducted between January and December 2021, compared BPS (n = 87), C-BPS (n = 85), and daily activity writing groups (DA; n = 82) on psychological outcomes. Each group completed a writing task over four consecutive weeks. Data were analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA, controlling for age, gender, educational attainment, relationship status, current work status, dyslexia (perceived or diagnosed), and perceived social support. The BPS led to short-term increases in positive affect and mood, and decreases in negative affect. However, this effect was limited to the first week, but the trajectories suggest temporal trends that warrant further investigation. In addition, the approach holds promise for specific groups (e.g. people with depression).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI