Effects of electroacupuncture on reducing labor pain and complications in the labor analgesia process of combined spinal–epidural analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia

To compare the pain scores and rates of complications in the labor analgesia process between the two groups. There were 127 participants being recruited in this research, and randomly divided into 2 groups according to the anesthetic technique: CSEA with PCEA with EA group (group 1), CSEA with PCEA group (group 2). Group 1 was first operated CSEA and PCEA, then EA at Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36) and Sanyinjiao (SP6) by HANS-200A device for 25 min. Group 2 was only treated by CSEA and PCEA. The main outcome was the VAS for labor pain. Meanwhile the complications, use of oxytocin, durations of three stages, delivery mode, cord blood pH and neonatus Apgar score in this study were considered as secondary outcomes. After labor analgesia, the VAS scores of group 1 at the five point-in-times were all lower than that of group 2. The rates of fever and urinary retention of group 1 were lower compared with group 2. Group 1 had less usage of oxytocin and shorter durations of cervical dilation from 3 to 10 cm and third stage than group 2. EA can help to reduce labor pain in CSEA with PCEA labor analgesia process, and may be able to reduce the complications.