评定量表
心理学
可靠性(半导体)
萧条(经济学)
情感障碍和精神分裂症时间表
临床心理学
相关性
比例(比率)
地铁列车时刻表
精神科
数学
计算机科学
发展心理学
焦虑
地图学
物理
地理
几何学
功率(物理)
经济
宏观经济学
操作系统
量子力学
出处
期刊:Archives of General Psychiatry
[American Medical Association]
日期:1981-01-01
卷期号:38 (1): 98-98
被引量:421
标识
DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780260100011
摘要
Investigators who wish to use new procedures usually wish to relate their results to those already in the literature. This often results in the use of both old and new measures. The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Regular and Change Versions (SADS and SADS-C) have advantages over the widely used Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). A procedure was developed to extract the HDRS score from the SADS and SADS-C. The comparative reliability and the validity of the extracted HDRS score as a substitute for a real HDRS score was established. The SADS-C and the HDRS were completed by the raters for 48 subjects. The correlation between the extracted and real HDRS scores was positive and large.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI