What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers’ decision making

定性性质 定性研究 扎根理论 直觉 心理学 数学教育 反思性练习 教育学 计算机科学 社会学 社会科学 机器学习 认知科学
作者
Jennifer E. Ho
出处
期刊:Evaluation and Program Planning [Elsevier]
卷期号:91: 102046-102046 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
摘要

The push for data-based decision making in schools has largely centered on the use of quantitative data to inform technical-rational processes of teachers' decision making. Previous attention to teachers' reliance on qualitative data - particularly unsystematically collected qualitative data – tends to focus on their use of intuition and is often characterized as a counter to evidence based inquiry. Limited research, however, has been conducted to understand how teachers actually apply available data within their classrooms, the factors that shape teachers' decision making, or what they consider credible in assessing their students' progress and achievement. In this collective case study, 15 teachers from three high schools discuss how they exercise professional judgment and make instructional decisions based on qualitative evidence. It takes an intentionally grounded approach to exploring the many data points that teachers draw upon as they face decision moments in their daily practice. In interviews and observations over the course of one school year, teachers describe various types of qualitative data that shed light on students' experiences as they undertake processes of learning. As these teachers glean bits and pieces of systematically and unsystematically collected qualitative data, including informal, undocumented data through conversations and observation, these data inspire reflective questioning and hypotheses about their instructional practice. While student progress should not be wholly assessed based on qualitative data, the findings show that we must acknowledge the inevitable and critical role these data play in guiding teachers' actions and informing their professional judgment. The persistent integration of qualitative data - though sometimes pointed to as a threat to rational decision-making processes – instead confirms a reliance upon them in guiding classroom instruction and a need to ensure their appropriate use.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
哎呀哎呀呀完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
miao发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
伯赏元彤完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
小金今天自律了吗完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
buyu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
彭于晏应助现代的无春采纳,获得10
1秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
lq完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
炸鸡腿完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
幽默身影发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
Shan发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
若枫发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助专注的枫叶采纳,获得10
3秒前
starlx0813完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
仁爱的凡波完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
曹晨完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
BIANYAN完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
多看文献发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
当你完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
不接组会完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
共享精神应助秋qiu采纳,获得10
6秒前
科研醉汉完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
聪明的从梦完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lifang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
平常破茧完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
桂花酒酿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
斯文败类应助Ysera采纳,获得10
8秒前
Spike完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
nostalgia完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
承蒙大爱发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1621
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] | NHBS Field Guides & Natural History 1500
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
Brittle fracture in welded ships 1000
Metagames: Games about Games 700
King Tyrant 680
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5573926
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4660203
关于积分的说明 14728382
捐赠科研通 4599980
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2524638
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1494989
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1465005