What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers’ decision making

定性性质 定性研究 扎根理论 直觉 心理学 数学教育 反思性练习 教育学 计算机科学 社会学 社会科学 机器学习 认知科学
作者
Jennifer E. Ho
出处
期刊:Evaluation and Program Planning [Elsevier]
卷期号:91: 102046-102046 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
摘要

The push for data-based decision making in schools has largely centered on the use of quantitative data to inform technical-rational processes of teachers' decision making. Previous attention to teachers' reliance on qualitative data - particularly unsystematically collected qualitative data – tends to focus on their use of intuition and is often characterized as a counter to evidence based inquiry. Limited research, however, has been conducted to understand how teachers actually apply available data within their classrooms, the factors that shape teachers' decision making, or what they consider credible in assessing their students' progress and achievement. In this collective case study, 15 teachers from three high schools discuss how they exercise professional judgment and make instructional decisions based on qualitative evidence. It takes an intentionally grounded approach to exploring the many data points that teachers draw upon as they face decision moments in their daily practice. In interviews and observations over the course of one school year, teachers describe various types of qualitative data that shed light on students' experiences as they undertake processes of learning. As these teachers glean bits and pieces of systematically and unsystematically collected qualitative data, including informal, undocumented data through conversations and observation, these data inspire reflective questioning and hypotheses about their instructional practice. While student progress should not be wholly assessed based on qualitative data, the findings show that we must acknowledge the inevitable and critical role these data play in guiding teachers' actions and informing their professional judgment. The persistent integration of qualitative data - though sometimes pointed to as a threat to rational decision-making processes – instead confirms a reliance upon them in guiding classroom instruction and a need to ensure their appropriate use.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
不安青牛应助123456采纳,获得20
1秒前
2秒前
陈陈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
霍师傅发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
哇奥发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
不要加糖发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
甜美的从蓉完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
10秒前
小兔子乖乖完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
学术屎壳郎完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
16秒前
16秒前
隐形饼干完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
苏哼哼发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
tree完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
洛luo发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
丘比特应助kukuki采纳,获得10
22秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助YJYLU采纳,获得10
23秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
在水一方应助扎心采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
24秒前
orixero应助海燕采纳,获得10
26秒前
26秒前
ronnie发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
27秒前
28秒前
zjq发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
隐形饼干发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
开心发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
Theoretical Modelling of Unbonded Flexible Pipe Cross-Sections 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Basic And Clinical Science Course 2025-2026 3000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
The polyurethanes book 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5610394
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4694892
关于积分的说明 14884996
捐赠科研通 4722310
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2545126
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1509949
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1473045