What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers’ decision making

定性性质 定性研究 扎根理论 直觉 心理学 数学教育 反思性练习 教育学 计算机科学 社会学 社会科学 机器学习 认知科学
作者
Jennifer E. Ho
出处
期刊:Evaluation and Program Planning [Elsevier]
卷期号:91: 102046-102046 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
摘要

The push for data-based decision making in schools has largely centered on the use of quantitative data to inform technical-rational processes of teachers' decision making. Previous attention to teachers' reliance on qualitative data - particularly unsystematically collected qualitative data – tends to focus on their use of intuition and is often characterized as a counter to evidence based inquiry. Limited research, however, has been conducted to understand how teachers actually apply available data within their classrooms, the factors that shape teachers' decision making, or what they consider credible in assessing their students' progress and achievement. In this collective case study, 15 teachers from three high schools discuss how they exercise professional judgment and make instructional decisions based on qualitative evidence. It takes an intentionally grounded approach to exploring the many data points that teachers draw upon as they face decision moments in their daily practice. In interviews and observations over the course of one school year, teachers describe various types of qualitative data that shed light on students' experiences as they undertake processes of learning. As these teachers glean bits and pieces of systematically and unsystematically collected qualitative data, including informal, undocumented data through conversations and observation, these data inspire reflective questioning and hypotheses about their instructional practice. While student progress should not be wholly assessed based on qualitative data, the findings show that we must acknowledge the inevitable and critical role these data play in guiding teachers' actions and informing their professional judgment. The persistent integration of qualitative data - though sometimes pointed to as a threat to rational decision-making processes – instead confirms a reliance upon them in guiding classroom instruction and a need to ensure their appropriate use.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI

祝大家在新的一年里科研腾飞
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zzzzzp完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
马喽发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
曹煜晗发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
长情孤风完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
华山完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
完美世界应助Tepid采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI6.1应助刘玄德采纳,获得10
12秒前
大模型应助a南妮采纳,获得10
21秒前
shouren完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
酷波er应助Tepid采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
隐形曼青应助贝果采纳,获得10
28秒前
孙成成完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
32秒前
Neo发布了新的文献求助80
33秒前
33秒前
36秒前
无聊的老姆完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
Tepid发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
KELE完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
刘玄德发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
深情安青应助舒心的雍采纳,获得10
46秒前
略略略完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
49秒前
二毛应助研友_Z3NGvn采纳,获得10
49秒前
小田发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
52秒前
受伤凌蝶发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
马喽完成签到,获得积分20
59秒前
59秒前
火星上笑蓝完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
飞快的蛋应助sunny采纳,获得10
1分钟前
字母发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
希哩哩完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
受伤凌蝶完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
drama_queen完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
菜鸟队长完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
落后中心完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 600
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
Competency Based Human Resource Management 500
How to Develop Robust Scale-up Strategies for Complex Injectable Dosage Forms 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5863589
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6393164
关于积分的说明 15649199
捐赠科研通 4977636
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2685102
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1628203
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1585881