亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers’ decision making

定性性质 定性研究 扎根理论 直觉 心理学 数学教育 反思性练习 教育学 计算机科学 社会学 社会科学 机器学习 认知科学
作者
Jennifer E. Ho
出处
期刊:Evaluation and Program Planning [Elsevier]
卷期号:91: 102046-102046 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
摘要

The push for data-based decision making in schools has largely centered on the use of quantitative data to inform technical-rational processes of teachers' decision making. Previous attention to teachers' reliance on qualitative data - particularly unsystematically collected qualitative data – tends to focus on their use of intuition and is often characterized as a counter to evidence based inquiry. Limited research, however, has been conducted to understand how teachers actually apply available data within their classrooms, the factors that shape teachers' decision making, or what they consider credible in assessing their students' progress and achievement. In this collective case study, 15 teachers from three high schools discuss how they exercise professional judgment and make instructional decisions based on qualitative evidence. It takes an intentionally grounded approach to exploring the many data points that teachers draw upon as they face decision moments in their daily practice. In interviews and observations over the course of one school year, teachers describe various types of qualitative data that shed light on students' experiences as they undertake processes of learning. As these teachers glean bits and pieces of systematically and unsystematically collected qualitative data, including informal, undocumented data through conversations and observation, these data inspire reflective questioning and hypotheses about their instructional practice. While student progress should not be wholly assessed based on qualitative data, the findings show that we must acknowledge the inevitable and critical role these data play in guiding teachers' actions and informing their professional judgment. The persistent integration of qualitative data - though sometimes pointed to as a threat to rational decision-making processes – instead confirms a reliance upon them in guiding classroom instruction and a need to ensure their appropriate use.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
18秒前
陈琳渝发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
商毛毛发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
30秒前
李爱国应助健康的雁风采纳,获得30
47秒前
泌尿刘亚东完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
能不能不看论文完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
11完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
朴素绿蝶完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小二郎应助凉水采纳,获得10
2分钟前
感叹完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
Gydl完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
凉水发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
ding应助ldy539采纳,获得10
2分钟前
小二郎应助Lululu采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
波波应助凉水采纳,获得10
2分钟前
ldy539发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
凉水完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
liuliu完成签到,获得积分20
3分钟前
Chenyol完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
忧伤的尔白完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
Frecklesss发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
4分钟前
香蕉觅云应助ceeray23采纳,获得20
4分钟前
Frecklesss完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
欢呼沅发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
充电宝应助欢呼沅采纳,获得10
5分钟前
赘婿应助曲幻梅采纳,获得10
5分钟前
Hello应助Founder采纳,获得30
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
6分钟前
ph完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 1000
First commercial application of ELCRES™ HTV150A film in Nichicon capacitors for AC-DC inverters: SABIC at PCIM Europe 1000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5996819
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7470671
关于积分的说明 16081061
捐赠科研通 5139838
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2756061
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1730374
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1629686