已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers’ decision making

定性性质 定性研究 扎根理论 直觉 心理学 数学教育 反思性练习 教育学 计算机科学 社会学 社会科学 机器学习 认知科学
作者
Jennifer E. Ho
出处
期刊:Evaluation and Program Planning [Elsevier]
卷期号:91: 102046-102046 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
摘要

The push for data-based decision making in schools has largely centered on the use of quantitative data to inform technical-rational processes of teachers' decision making. Previous attention to teachers' reliance on qualitative data - particularly unsystematically collected qualitative data – tends to focus on their use of intuition and is often characterized as a counter to evidence based inquiry. Limited research, however, has been conducted to understand how teachers actually apply available data within their classrooms, the factors that shape teachers' decision making, or what they consider credible in assessing their students' progress and achievement. In this collective case study, 15 teachers from three high schools discuss how they exercise professional judgment and make instructional decisions based on qualitative evidence. It takes an intentionally grounded approach to exploring the many data points that teachers draw upon as they face decision moments in their daily practice. In interviews and observations over the course of one school year, teachers describe various types of qualitative data that shed light on students' experiences as they undertake processes of learning. As these teachers glean bits and pieces of systematically and unsystematically collected qualitative data, including informal, undocumented data through conversations and observation, these data inspire reflective questioning and hypotheses about their instructional practice. While student progress should not be wholly assessed based on qualitative data, the findings show that we must acknowledge the inevitable and critical role these data play in guiding teachers' actions and informing their professional judgment. The persistent integration of qualitative data - though sometimes pointed to as a threat to rational decision-making processes – instead confirms a reliance upon them in guiding classroom instruction and a need to ensure their appropriate use.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
星辰大海应助科研小巴采纳,获得10
刚刚
小蘑菇发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
Cecilia发布了新的文献求助50
2秒前
黑摄会阿Fay完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
5秒前
随机科研完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
烟花应助小盖采纳,获得10
5秒前
MJH123456发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
大神瓜发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
张张发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
是菜团子呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
css1997完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
曾经易烟完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
科目三应助张张采纳,获得10
16秒前
wam关闭了wam文献求助
16秒前
小盖发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
科研通AI6应助喵晓懒采纳,获得10
19秒前
科研小巴发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
BruceZh完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
小蘑菇完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
小盖完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
务实的千风完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
hxt发布了新的文献求助50
25秒前
sj发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
pual完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
易夜雨居完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
昌莆完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
健忘浩宇完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
科研通AI6应助sensen采纳,获得10
32秒前
Criminology34应助务实的千风采纳,获得10
34秒前
35秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Reproduction Third Edition 3000
《药学类医疗服务价格项目立项指南(征求意见稿)》 1000
花の香りの秘密―遺伝子情報から機能性まで 800
1st Edition Sports Rehabilitation and Training Multidisciplinary Perspectives By Richard Moss, Adam Gledhill 600
nephSAP® Nephrology Self-Assessment Program - Hypertension The American Society of Nephrology 500
Digital and Social Media Marketing 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5627693
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4714530
关于积分的说明 14963003
捐赠科研通 4785420
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2555122
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1516460
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1476875