What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers’ decision making

定性性质 定性研究 扎根理论 直觉 心理学 数学教育 反思性练习 教育学 计算机科学 社会学 社会科学 机器学习 认知科学
作者
Jennifer E. Ho
出处
期刊:Evaluation and Program Planning [Elsevier]
卷期号:91: 102046-102046 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
摘要

The push for data-based decision making in schools has largely centered on the use of quantitative data to inform technical-rational processes of teachers' decision making. Previous attention to teachers' reliance on qualitative data - particularly unsystematically collected qualitative data – tends to focus on their use of intuition and is often characterized as a counter to evidence based inquiry. Limited research, however, has been conducted to understand how teachers actually apply available data within their classrooms, the factors that shape teachers' decision making, or what they consider credible in assessing their students' progress and achievement. In this collective case study, 15 teachers from three high schools discuss how they exercise professional judgment and make instructional decisions based on qualitative evidence. It takes an intentionally grounded approach to exploring the many data points that teachers draw upon as they face decision moments in their daily practice. In interviews and observations over the course of one school year, teachers describe various types of qualitative data that shed light on students' experiences as they undertake processes of learning. As these teachers glean bits and pieces of systematically and unsystematically collected qualitative data, including informal, undocumented data through conversations and observation, these data inspire reflective questioning and hypotheses about their instructional practice. While student progress should not be wholly assessed based on qualitative data, the findings show that we must acknowledge the inevitable and critical role these data play in guiding teachers' actions and informing their professional judgment. The persistent integration of qualitative data - though sometimes pointed to as a threat to rational decision-making processes – instead confirms a reliance upon them in guiding classroom instruction and a need to ensure their appropriate use.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
daydayup发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
NOV发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
刚刚
ISLAND发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Jamie完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
杯中冰糖茶完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
飘逸的巧凡完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
zheng_chen完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小米应助默默采纳,获得10
4秒前
佐伊完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
烤冷面发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
默默刚发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Hello应助~Dreamboat采纳,获得30
7秒前
犹豫的若完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
科研通AI6.1应助鼠shu采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
科研通AI6.1应助YTL采纳,获得10
10秒前
snows2004完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
llynvxia完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
拉哈80应助祝可盈采纳,获得10
11秒前
12545完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
wangdong发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
甄幻梦完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
无限的灵完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
xudanhong发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
zz完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
铁布衫金钟罩完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
CAOHOU应助晨光采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
21秒前
皓月孤烟应助晴朗采纳,获得10
21秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
LU完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
无限的灵关注了科研通微信公众号
22秒前
高分求助中
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 40000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 2500
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
从k到英国情人 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5743528
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5414569
关于积分的说明 15347814
捐赠科研通 4884209
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2625665
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1574515
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1531418