What counts? The critical role of qualitative data in teachers’ decision making

定性性质 定性研究 扎根理论 直觉 心理学 数学教育 反思性练习 教育学 计算机科学 社会学 社会科学 机器学习 认知科学
作者
Jennifer E. Ho
出处
期刊:Evaluation and Program Planning [Elsevier]
卷期号:91: 102046-102046 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102046
摘要

The push for data-based decision making in schools has largely centered on the use of quantitative data to inform technical-rational processes of teachers' decision making. Previous attention to teachers' reliance on qualitative data - particularly unsystematically collected qualitative data – tends to focus on their use of intuition and is often characterized as a counter to evidence based inquiry. Limited research, however, has been conducted to understand how teachers actually apply available data within their classrooms, the factors that shape teachers' decision making, or what they consider credible in assessing their students' progress and achievement. In this collective case study, 15 teachers from three high schools discuss how they exercise professional judgment and make instructional decisions based on qualitative evidence. It takes an intentionally grounded approach to exploring the many data points that teachers draw upon as they face decision moments in their daily practice. In interviews and observations over the course of one school year, teachers describe various types of qualitative data that shed light on students' experiences as they undertake processes of learning. As these teachers glean bits and pieces of systematically and unsystematically collected qualitative data, including informal, undocumented data through conversations and observation, these data inspire reflective questioning and hypotheses about their instructional practice. While student progress should not be wholly assessed based on qualitative data, the findings show that we must acknowledge the inevitable and critical role these data play in guiding teachers' actions and informing their professional judgment. The persistent integration of qualitative data - though sometimes pointed to as a threat to rational decision-making processes – instead confirms a reliance upon them in guiding classroom instruction and a need to ensure their appropriate use.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
lucky发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
和谐小鸭子完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
幽默的泥猴桃完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
超级的三问完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
顺心秋天完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
LAN0528发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
晓晓鹤发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Orange应助桔子采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
糖果完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
当归完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
玩命的幻香完成签到 ,获得积分20
6秒前
ABC的风格完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
SciGPT应助任炳成采纳,获得20
7秒前
淡淡夕阳完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
悦耳的阑悦完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
烟花应助T_KYG采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
luobin完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
老高发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
科研通AI6应助hp采纳,获得10
10秒前
卷卷完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
热情豌豆完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
列娜完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
liu发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
那只幸运的小肥羊完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
yb完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
TRY发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
卷卷发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
虎杖悠仁完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
八号仓上半场完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
lq8996完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
99完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5600957
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4686530
关于积分的说明 14844417
捐赠科研通 4679086
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2539100
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1505992
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471252