Predictors of Outcome in Patients with Pediatric Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Development and Validation of a Modified Score

医学 置信区间 队列 脑出血 内科学 人口 多元分析 优势比 队列研究 前瞻性队列研究 格拉斯哥昏迷指数 外科 环境卫生
作者
Alexis Guédon,Thomas Blauwblomme,Grégoire Boulouis,Camille Jousset,Philippe Meyer,Manoëlle Kossorotoff,Marie Bourgeois,Stéphanie Puget,Michel Zérah,Catherine Oppenheim,J. Meder,Nathalie Boddaert,Françis Brunelle,Christian Sainte‐Rose,Olivier Naggara
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:286 (2): 651-658 被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.2017170152
摘要

Purpose To propose and validate a modified pediatric intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH) (mPICH) score and to compare its association with functional outcome to that of the original PICH score. Materials and Methods Data from prospectively included patients were retrospectively analyzed. Consecutive patients with nontraumatic PICH who had undergone clinical follow-up were included. The study population was divided into a development cohort (2008–2012, n = 100) and a validation cohort (2013–2016, n = 43). An mPICH score was developed after variables associated with poor outcome were identified at multivariate analysis (King’s Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury score < 5a) in the development cohort. The accuracy of the score for prediction of poor outcome was evaluated (sensitivity, specificity). Discrimination and calibration of associations between the mPICH score and poor outcome cohorts were assessed (C statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). Results The mPICH score assessed as follows: brain herniation, four points; altered mental status, three points; hydrocephalus, two points; infratentorial PICH, two points; intraventricular hemorrhage, one point; PICH volume greater than 2% of total brain volume, one point. An mPICH score greater than 5 was associated with severe disability or worse, with sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83%, 100%) and specificity of 61% (95% CI: 49%, 73%). The C statistic was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89). In the validation cohort, sensitivity and specificity were 95.2% (95% CI: 76%, 99%) and 77% (95% CI: 55%, 92%), respectively. There was no significant difference between the observed and predicted risks of poor outcome (P = .46). Conclusion An mPICH score was developed as a simple clinical and imaging grading scale for acute prognosis in patients with PICH. © RSNA, 2017
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Schmoo完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
圆圆的脑袋应助涛浪采纳,获得10
4秒前
隐形曼青应助皮皮桂采纳,获得10
5秒前
凝子老师完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
奶糖发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
TORCH完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
李健的小迷弟应助lin采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
TT发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
奶糖完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
丘比特应助浪迹天涯采纳,获得10
12秒前
14秒前
14秒前
虚幻白玉发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
清客完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
传奇3应助阳阳采纳,获得10
15秒前
17秒前
皮皮桂发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
Hello应助无奈傲菡采纳,获得10
17秒前
故意的傲玉应助FENGHUI采纳,获得10
18秒前
19秒前
科研通AI5应助nextconnie采纳,获得10
20秒前
James完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
Lucas应助sun采纳,获得10
22秒前
KristenStewart完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
过时的热狗完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
点点完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
Zxc发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
涨芝士完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
27秒前
无名欧文关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
科研123完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
crescent完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
无奈傲菡发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
烟花应助123号采纳,获得10
34秒前
超帅的遥完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
Luis Lacasa - Sobre esto y aquello 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527998
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3108225
关于积分的说明 9288086
捐赠科研通 2805889
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540195
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716950
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709849