Predictors of Outcome in Patients with Pediatric Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Development and Validation of a Modified Score

医学 置信区间 队列 脑出血 内科学 人口 多元分析 优势比 队列研究 前瞻性队列研究 格拉斯哥昏迷指数 外科 环境卫生
作者
Alexis Guédon,Thomas Blauwblomme,Grégoire Boulouis,Camille Jousset,Philippe Meyer,Manoëlle Kossorotoff,Marie Bourgeois,Stéphanie Puget,Michel Zérah,Catherine Oppenheim,J. Meder,Nathalie Boddaert,Françis Brunelle,Christian Sainte‐Rose,Olivier Naggara
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:286 (2): 651-658 被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.2017170152
摘要

Purpose To propose and validate a modified pediatric intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH) (mPICH) score and to compare its association with functional outcome to that of the original PICH score. Materials and Methods Data from prospectively included patients were retrospectively analyzed. Consecutive patients with nontraumatic PICH who had undergone clinical follow-up were included. The study population was divided into a development cohort (2008–2012, n = 100) and a validation cohort (2013–2016, n = 43). An mPICH score was developed after variables associated with poor outcome were identified at multivariate analysis (King’s Outcome Scale for Childhood Head Injury score < 5a) in the development cohort. The accuracy of the score for prediction of poor outcome was evaluated (sensitivity, specificity). Discrimination and calibration of associations between the mPICH score and poor outcome cohorts were assessed (C statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). Results The mPICH score assessed as follows: brain herniation, four points; altered mental status, three points; hydrocephalus, two points; infratentorial PICH, two points; intraventricular hemorrhage, one point; PICH volume greater than 2% of total brain volume, one point. An mPICH score greater than 5 was associated with severe disability or worse, with sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83%, 100%) and specificity of 61% (95% CI: 49%, 73%). The C statistic was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89). In the validation cohort, sensitivity and specificity were 95.2% (95% CI: 76%, 99%) and 77% (95% CI: 55%, 92%), respectively. There was no significant difference between the observed and predicted risks of poor outcome (P = .46). Conclusion An mPICH score was developed as a simple clinical and imaging grading scale for acute prognosis in patients with PICH. © RSNA, 2017

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
求助人员应助coollz采纳,获得10
刚刚
YukiXu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
2秒前
思源应助曾经大地采纳,获得10
2秒前
醍醐不醒完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
6秒前
6秒前
科研通AI6应助panyubo采纳,获得10
6秒前
悠悠发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
8秒前
LOTUS发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
扎根完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
柏不斜发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
coollz完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
扎根发布了新的文献求助150
13秒前
乐in林发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
玩命的小虾米完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
junlin完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
所所应助surain采纳,获得10
16秒前
AMM发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Tian发布了新的文献求助100
18秒前
18秒前
FashionBoy应助聪明海云采纳,获得10
20秒前
666发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
TCMning发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
24秒前
四玖玖完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
酷波er应助xx采纳,获得10
28秒前
海斯泰因发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Daisy发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
害怕的水之完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
一生低首向东坡完成签到,获得积分20
30秒前
风吹麦田应助ljn采纳,获得50
30秒前
30秒前
深情的鞯发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
heaven发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1621
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] | NHBS Field Guides & Natural History 1500
The Victim–Offender Overlap During the Global Pandemic: A Comparative Study Across Western and Non-Western Countries 1000
King Tyrant 720
T/CIET 1631—2025《构网型柔性直流输电技术应用指南》 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5588751
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4671674
关于积分的说明 14788516
捐赠科研通 4626078
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2531920
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1500505
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1468329