小泡
纳米粒子跟踪分析
流式细胞术
微泡
细胞仪
细胞外小泡
粒径
化学
透射电子显微镜
纳米颗粒
胞外囊泡
材料科学
生物物理学
纳米技术
分析化学(期刊)
色谱法
生物
分子生物学
膜
生物化学
细胞生物学
物理化学
小RNA
基因
作者
Edwin van der Pol,Yvonne Couch,Anita E. Grootemaat,Chris Gardiner,Ian L. Sargent,Paul Harrison,Auguste Sturk,Ton G. van Leeuwen,Rienk Nieuwland
摘要
Enumeration of extracellular vesicles has clinical potential as a biomarker for disease. In biological samples, the smallest and largest vesicles typically differ 25-fold in size, 300,000-fold in concentration, 20,000-fold in volume, and 10,000,000-fold in scattered light. Because of this heterogeneity, the currently employed techniques detect concentrations ranging from 10(4) to 10(12) vesicles mL(-1) .To investigate whether the large variation in the detected concentration of vesicles is caused by the minimum detectable vesicle size of five widely used techniques.The size and concentration of vesicles and reference beads were measured with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), a conventional flow cytometer, a flow cytometer dedicated to detecting submicrometer particles, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), and resistive pulse sensing (RPS).Each technique gave a different size distribution and a different concentration for the same vesicle sample.Differences between the detected vesicle concentrations are primarily caused by differences between the minimum detectable vesicle sizes. The minimum detectable vesicle sizes were 70-90 nm for NTA, 70-100 nm for RPS, 150-190 nm for dedicated flow cytometry, and 270-600 nm for conventional flow cytometry. TEM could detect the smallest vesicles present, albeit after adhesion on a surface. Dedicated flow cytometry was most accurate in determining the size of reference beads, but is expected to be less accurate on vesicles, owing to heterogeneity of the refractive index of vesicles. Nevertheless, dedicated flow cytometry is relatively fast and allows multiplex fluorescence detection, making it most applicable to clinical research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI