医学
心房颤动
导管消融
烧蚀
不利影响
随机化
内科学
导管
危险系数
随机对照试验
心脏病学
外科
置信区间
前瞻性队列研究
麻醉
作者
David J. Wilber,Carlo Pappone,Petr Neužil,Angelo de Paola,Francis E. Marchlinski,Andrea Natale,Laurent Macle,Emile G. Daoud,Hugh Calkins,Burr Hall,Vivek Y. Reddy,Giuseppe Augello,Matthew R. Reynolds,Chandan Vinekar,Christine Y. Liu,Scott Berry,Donald A. Berry,for the ThermoCool AF Trial Investigators
出处
期刊:JAMA
[American Medical Association]
日期:2010-01-26
卷期号:303 (4): 333-333
被引量:1100
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2009.2029
摘要
Antiarrhythmic drugs are commonly used for prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) despite inconsistent efficacy and frequent adverse effects. Catheter ablation has been proposed as an alternative treatment for paroxysmal AF.To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT) in treating symptomatic paroxysmal AF.A prospective, multicenter, randomized (2:1), unblinded, Bayesian-designed study conducted at 19 hospitals of 167 patients who did not respond to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug and who experienced at least 3 AF episodes within 6 months before randomization. Enrollment occurred between October 25, 2004, and October 11, 2007, with the last follow-up on January 19, 2009.Catheter ablation (n = 106) or ADT (n = 61), with assessment for effectiveness in a comparable 9-month follow-up period.Time to protocol-defined treatment failure. The proportion of patients who experienced major treatment-related adverse events within 30 days of catheter ablation or ADT was also reported.At the end of the 9-month effectiveness evaluation period, 66% of patients in the catheter ablation group remained free from protocol-defined treatment failure compared with 16% of patients treated with ADT. The hazard ratio of catheter ablation to ADT was 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.47; P < .001). Major 30-day treatment-related adverse events occurred in 5 of 57 patients (8.8%) treated with ADT and 5 of 103 patients (4.9%) treated with catheter ablation. Mean quality of life scores improved significantly in patients treated by catheter ablation compared with ADT at 3 months; improvement was maintained during the course of the study.Among patients with paroxysmal AF who had not responded to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug, the use of catheter ablation compared with ADT resulted in a longer time to treatment failure during the 9-month follow-up period.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00116428.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI