Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis

医学 随机对照试验 急性阑尾炎 阑尾炎 科克伦图书馆 抗生素 金标准(测试) 腹痛 梅德林 外科 普通外科 内科学 政治学 法学 微生物学 生物
作者
Ingrid MHA Wilms,Dominique ENM de Hoog,Dianne C de Visser,H Janzing
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
被引量:195
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd008359.pub2
摘要

Background Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Present day treatment of choice for acute appendicitis is appendectomy, however complications are inherent to operative treatment. Though surgical appendectomy remains the standard treatment, several investigators have investigated conservative antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis and reported good results. Objectives Is antibiotic treatment as effective as surgical appendectomy (laparoscopic or open) in patients with acute appendicitis on recovery within two weeks, without major complications (including recurrence) within one year? Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 6, 2011); MEDLINE (until June 2011); EMBASE (until June 2011); Prospective Trial Registers (June 2011) and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria Randomised and quasi‐randomised clinical trials (RCT and qRCT) comparing antibiotic treatment with appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis were included. Excluded were studies which primarily focused on the complications of acute appendicitis. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors contacted the trial authors for additional information if required. Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager and MetaAnalyst. A non‐inferiority analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic treatment (ABT) to the gold standard (appendectomy). By consensus, a 20% margin of non‐inferiority was considered clinically relevant. Main results Five RCT's (901 patients) were assessed. In total 73.4% (95% CI 62.7 to 81.9) of patients who were treated with antibiotics and 97.4 (95% CI 94.4 to 98.8) patients who directly got an appendectomy were cured within two weeks without major complications (including recurrence) within one year. The lower 95% CI was 15.2% below the 20% margin for the primary outcome. Authors' conclusions The upper bound of the 95% CI of ABT for cure within two weeks without major complications crosses the 20% margin of appendectomy, so the outcome is inconclusive. Also the quality of the studies was low to moderate, for that reason the results should be interpret with caution and definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore we conclude that appendectomy remains the standard treatment for acute appendicitis. Antibiotic treatment might be used as an alternative treatment in a good quality RCT or in specific patients or conditions were surgery is contraindicated.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
zrw发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
phw2333完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
大模型应助超人爱吃菠菜采纳,获得10
2秒前
orixero应助zhoujy采纳,获得10
2秒前
kkk发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ranqi完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
善学以致用应助敏感初露采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
啊我吗完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Costing完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
叶子发布了新的文献求助20
5秒前
5秒前
深情安青应助coilamdau采纳,获得20
6秒前
饱满酸奶完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
11111完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
做个梦给你完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
沧海泪完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Renhong发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
桐桐应助agsbiqwgudo采纳,获得50
8秒前
8秒前
Lucas应助尊敬寒松采纳,获得10
8秒前
lolo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
weddcf发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
詹卫卫发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
郝宝真发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
骐骥过隙完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
XinEr完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
竹外桃花发布了新的文献求助20
13秒前
上官若男应助粱踏歌采纳,获得10
13秒前
shanshan发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
The Young builders of New china : the visit of the delegation of the WFDY to the Chinese People's Republic 1000
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
Foreign Policy of the French Second Empire: A Bibliography 500
Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3147773
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2798855
关于积分的说明 7831859
捐赠科研通 2455728
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1306927
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 627945
版权声明 601587