医学
危险系数
置信区间
阴道分娩
产科
体质指数
比例危险模型
妇科
子宫切除术
奇偶性(物理)
剖宫产
回顾性队列研究
怀孕
外科
内科学
生物
粒子物理学
物理
遗传学
作者
Rui Wang,Paul K. Tulikangas,Elena Tunitsky-Bitton
出处
期刊:Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2020-09-09
卷期号:27 (2): e423-e426
被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1097/spv.0000000000000952
摘要
To determine the relationship between age at first delivery and subsequent risk of pelvic organ prolapse.We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 2005 to 2012. Our primary outcome was self-reported prolapse. Survival analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate parous women's risks of reporting prolapse in terms of time since first delivery, adjusting for parity, body mass index, prior hysterectomy, ethnicity, and education. We performed subgroup analyses on women with at least 1 vaginal delivery and those with only cesarean deliveries.The survey-weighted prevalence of prolapse was 2.82%. A total of 6203 women, 79% of all parous women surveyed, reported age at first delivery. Kaplan-Meier curves were different for women based on age at first delivery (P = 0.034). For each year increase in age at first delivery, there was a 6% increase in the rate of developing prolapse (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.11; P = 0.011). Compared with a woman who was 20 years at her first delivery, someone who was 30 years had 1.79 times the risk, while at 40 years the risk was 3.21 times. Among women with at least 1 vaginal delivery, the same relationship was found (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.12; P = 0.019). However, this was not significant for women with only cesarean deliveries (P = 0.367).Older age at the time of first delivery was associated with a higher risk of subsequent prolapse. These results should be interpreted with caution given the limitations of cross-sectional survey data.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI