简短疼痛清单
医学
四分位间距
急诊科
结构效度
疼痛量表
物理疗法
慢性疼痛
内科学
外科
患者满意度
精神科
作者
Dana D. Im,Guruprasad Jambaulikar,Anna Kikut,Jasmine Y Gale,Scott G. Weiner
出处
期刊:Pain Medicine
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2020-07-30
卷期号:21 (12): 3263-3269
被引量:28
摘要
Abstract Objective The numeric rating scale (NRS), which does not capture the multidimensional experience of pain, is commonly used to measure pain in the emergency department (ED). In this study, we assess the utility and feasibility of the Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form (BPI-SF) in the ED. Methods This was a cross-sectional, prospective, convenience sample study of adult patients presenting to the ED with chest, abdominal, or musculoskeletal pain. Using confirmatory factor analysis, we investigated the construct validity of the BPI-SF. We determined the association between NRS and BPI-SF scores. We assessed the feasibility and utility of administering the BPI-SF in the ED setting by evaluating 1) the time required to complete the BPI-SF and 2) how patients perceive the BPI-SF compared with the NRS. Results One hundred participants were included for analysis. The median NRS pain level on ED arrival (interquartile range [IQR]) was 7 (5–8). The median BPI-SF score (IQR) was 57 (43–73) on a 0–110 scale. Fit indices for the two-factor structure were statistically superior when compared with the one-factor model of the BPI-SF (comparative fit index 0.90 vs 0.64). Higher pain severity score, pain interference score, and total BPI-SF score were associated with higher NRS scores (P < 0.01). The mean time needed to complete the BPI-SF (SD) was 3 minutes 47 seconds (1 minute 35 seconds). Seventy-three percent of the patients preferred the BPI-SF to the NRS for pain assessment in the ED. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the validity, feasibility, and utility of the BPI-SF in the ED setting.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI