The Use of Osteobiologics in Single versus Multi-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

医学 颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术 单层 系统回顾 脊柱融合术 外科 颈椎 梅德林 政治学 法学
作者
Jim Hoffmann,Guillermo Alejandro Ricciardi,Ratko Yurac,Hans-Jörg Meisel,Zorica Buser,Bangping Qian,Pieter-Paul A. Vergroesen
出处
期刊:Global Spine Journal [SAGE]
卷期号:14 (2_suppl): 110S-119S
标识
DOI:10.1177/21925682221136482
摘要

Study Design Systematic literature review. Objectives In this study we assessed evidence for the use of osteobiologics in single vs multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spine degeneration. The primary objective was to compare fusion rates after single and multi-level surgery with different osteobiologics. Secondary objectives were to compare differences in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications. Methods After a global team of reviewers was selected, a systematic review using different repositories was performed, confirming to PRISMA and GRADE guidelines. In total 1206 articles were identified and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 articles were eligible for analysis. Extracted data included fusion rates, definition of fusion, patient reported outcome measures, types of osteobiologics used, complications, adverse events and revisions. Results Fusion rates ranged from 87.7% to 100% for bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and 88.6% to 94.7% for demineralized bone matrix, while fusion rates reported for other osteobiologics were lower. All included studies showed PROMs improved significantly for each osteobiologic. However, no differences were reported when comparing osteobiologics, or when comparing single vs multi-level surgery specifically. Conclusion The highest fusion rates after 2-level ACDF for cervical spine degeneration were reported when BMP-2 was used. However, PROMs did not differ between the different osteobiologics. Further blinded randomized trials should be performed to compare the use of BMP-2 in single vs multi-level ACDF specifically.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
笔芯完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
祖问筠完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
科研通AI2S应助bear采纳,获得10
3秒前
Crest发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
张晴完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
tourist585发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
研究僧-卓发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
史迪仔发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
yagye56完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
华仔应助Darlin采纳,获得10
12秒前
kryie发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
蓝璃完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
18秒前
aliime发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
黄橙子发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
一朵云完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
21楼的风完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
蓝璃发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
研友_ZragOn发布了新的文献求助80
23秒前
情怀应助WDS采纳,获得10
25秒前
时玖完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
28秒前
Aurora完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
bkagyin应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
WDS完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
Singularity应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
Second Language Writing (2nd Edition) by Ken Hyland, 2019 1000
rhetoric, logic and argumentation: a guide to student writers 1000
QMS18Ed2 | process management. 2nd ed 1000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
A Chronicle of Small Beer: The Memoirs of Nan Green 1000
From Rural China to the Ivy League: Reminiscences of Transformations in Modern Chinese History 900
Eric Dunning and the Sociology of Sport 850
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 免疫学 细胞生物学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2918511
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2559157
关于积分的说明 6923859
捐赠科研通 2218776
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1179355
版权声明 588539
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 577137