The efficacy of re-excision after unplanned excision for synovial sarcoma

BackgroundThis investigation studied the clinical features and outcomes of synovial sarcoma (SS) patients from a single institution.MethodsA retrospective clinicopathologic study was conducted on 129 postoperative SS patients during 2003–2018. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression (Cox) models were performed to determine the parameters associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) via univariate and multivariate analysis. The impact of unplanned excision (UE) and residual tumor in re-excision specimens was evaluated.ResultsThe 3-year RFS, MFS and 5-year CSS were 72 %, 70 %, and 76 %, respectively. Independent factors associated with significantly inferior survival included older age, UE without re-excision, UE with residual tumors, high grade, and deep tumor for RFS, trunk-related tumor, UE without re-excision, UE with residual tumors, and deep tumor for MFS, UE with residual tumors, high grade, and deep tumor for CSS. Re-excision after UE was significantly associated with better RFS (P < 0.001). Residual tumors were remarkably correlated with inferior RFS (P = 0.0012), MFS (P = 0.0016), and CSS (P = 0.048), especially in patients at stage II (MFS: P < 0.001, CSS: P = 0.0014).ConclusionUE and residual tumors have a marked impact on the long-term survival of SS patients. Primary wide excision and re-excision is especially essential for patients at stage II.