Clinical value of foot thermometry in patients with acute limb ischemia

Objective We hypothesized that the severity of foot poikilothermy can be used for better differentiation of grades of acute limb ischemia. Thus, the study aim was evaluation of the value of non-contact foot thermometry, performed using a low-cost infrared medical thermometer, as an adjunct for clinical diagnosis of immediately threatened acute limb ischemia. Methods It was a single-center observational prospective study performed over 3 years. Patients with acute limb ischemia of lower limbs grade I–IIB Rutherford treated with urgent revascularization were included. Grade of ischemia was determined independently by two experienced vascular surgeons. Thermometry of the ischemic foot was performed using a medical digital infrared non-contact thermometer (CK-T1501, Cooligg, China) with measuring accuracy of ±0.2°C. Temperature was measured in three points: the dorsal surface of the foot, plantar surface of the foot (both in the metatarsal region), and forehead. The maximal temperature gradient between patient’s forehead and foot (∆T max F-F) was calculated. Measurements were repeated 6–12 h after revascularization. Results A total of 147 patients were included. Only 3 (2%) patients presented rest pain without sensory loss and motor deficit, while the majority were diagnosed with mild (63/147, 42.8%) or moderate (27/147, 18.3%) motor deficit. The temperature of the ischemic foot varied from 20 to 36.1°C, while median value of the temperature was 26.7 [24.5–29.9] °C on the dorsal surface and 26.8 [24.5–29.6] °C on the plantar surface of the foot ( p = 0.85). Patients with Grade IIB ischemia had significantly lower dorsal foot temperature, plantar foot temperature, and larger ∆T max F-F than the patients with grades I–IIA: 25.1 [23.9–26.8] °C versus 29.9 [27.6–30.8] °C; 25.2 [23.8–27.5] °C versus 29.6 [28–31.1] °C; and 11.6 [9.7–12.8] °C versus 7.2 [6–9] °C ( p < 0.0001). Areas under ROC curve for diagnosis of Grade IIB ischemia were similar for dorsal foot temperature (0.82), plantar temperature (0.81), and ∆T max F-F (0.82). The best cutoff value by Youden was ≥9.5°C for ∆T max F-F, ≤26.8°C for dorsal, and ≤27.7°C for plantar temperature. Criterion ∆T max F-F offered the highest specificity of 86% (95%CI 74.2–93.7) and positive predictive value of 89.2% (95%CI 79.5–93.2), while plantar temperature offered sensitivity of 82.5% (95%CI 70.1–91.3) and negative predictive value of 69.1% (95%CI 57.6–83.2). In multivariate analysis including age, gender, and etiology of arterial occlusion, the criterion ∆T max F-F of ≥9.5°C was a unique variable significantly associated with risk of amputation (adjusted OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.2–5.9, p = 0.01). Conclusion Current study demonstrated that patients with immediately threatening ALI have significantly lower foot temperature than those with viable and marginally threatened limbs. Severe foot poikilothermy at admission is associated with poor outcomes of revascularization, mostly with limb loss.