结直肠癌
医学
危险系数
回顾性队列研究
比例危险模型
癌症
肿瘤科
置信区间
内科学
作者
Xiaofeng Jiang,Michael Hoffmeister,Hermann Brenner,Hannah Sophie Muti,Tanwei Yuan,Sebastian Foersch,Nicholas P. West,Alexander Brobeil,Jitendra Jonnagaddala,Nicholas J. Hawkins,Robyn L. Ward,Titus J. Brinker,Oliver Lester Saldanha,Jia Ke,Wolfram Müller,Heike I. Grabsch,Philip Quirke,Daniel Truhn,Jakob Nikolas Kather
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00208-x
摘要
Background Precise prognosis prediction in patients with colorectal cancer (ie, forecasting survival) is pivotal for individualised treatment and care.Histopathological tissue slides of colorectal cancer specimens contain rich prognostically relevant information.However, existing studies do not have multicentre external validation with realworld sample processing protocols, and algorithms are not yet widely used in clinical routine. MethodsIn this retrospective, multicentre study, we collected tissue samples from four groups of patients with resected colorectal cancer from Australia, Germany, and the USA.We developed and externally validated a deep learning-based prognostic-stratification system for automatic prediction of overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with resected colorectal cancer.We used the model-predicted risk scores to stratify patients into different risk groups and compared survival outcomes between these groups.Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic value of these risk groups after adjusting for established prognostic variables. FindingsWe trained and validated our model on a total of 4428 patients.We found that patients could be divided into high-risk and low-risk groups on the basis of the deep learning-based risk score.On the internal test set, the group with a high-risk score had a worse prognosis than the group with a low-risk score, as reflected by a hazard ratio (HR) of 4•50 (95% CI 3•33-6•09) for overall survival and 8•35 (5•06-13•78) for disease-specific survival (DSS).We found consistent performance across three large external test sets.In a test set of 1395 patients, the high-risk group had a lower DSS than the low-risk group, with an HR of 3•08 (2•44-3•89).In two additional test sets, the HRs for DSS were 2•23 (1•23-4•04) and 3•07 (1•78-5•3).We showed that the prognostic value of the deep learning-based risk score is independent of established clinical risk factors.Interpretation Our findings indicate that attention-based self-supervised deep learning can robustly offer a prognosis on clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer, generalising across different populations and serving as a potentially new prognostic tool in clinical decision making for colorectal cancer management.We release all source codes and trained models under an open-source licence, allowing other researchers to reuse and build upon our work.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI