汇报
干预(咨询)
医疗保健
心理学
医学教育
循证实践
经验证据
医学
护理部
应用心理学
替代医学
政治学
哲学
认识论
病理
法学
作者
Jonathan P. Duff,Kate J. Morse,Julia Seelandt,Isabel T. Gross,Melissa Lydston,Joan Sargeant,Peter Dieckmann,Joseph A. Allen,Jenny W. Rudolph,Michaela Kolbe
出处
期刊:Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2024-01-01
卷期号:19 (1S): S112-S121
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1097/sih.0000000000000765
摘要
Abstract Debriefing is a critical component in most simulation experiences. With the growing number of debriefing concepts, approaches, and tools, we need to understand how to debrief most effectively because there is little empiric evidence to guide us in their use. This systematic review explores the current literature on debriefing in healthcare simulation education to understand the evidence behind practice and clarify gaps in the literature. The PICO question for this review was defined as “In healthcare providers [P], does the use of one debriefing or feedback intervention [I], compared to a different debriefing or feedback intervention [C], improve educational and clinical outcomes [O] in simulation-based education?” We included 70 studies in our final review and found that our current debriefing strategies, frameworks, and techniques are not based on robust empirical evidence. Based on this, we highlight future research needs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI