作者
Séverine Vermeire,Jurij Hanžel,Mark Löwenberg,Marc Ferrante,Peter Bossuyt,Frank Hoentjen,Denis Franchimont,Károly Palatka,Harald Peeters,Aart Mookhoek,Gert De Hertogh,Tamás Molnár,Wouter Van Moerkercke,Triana Lobatón Ortega,Esmé Clasquin,Melanie S. Hulshoff,Filip Baert,Geert D’Haens,Séverine Vermeire,Mark Löwenberg,Marc Ferrante,Peter Bossuyt,Frank Hoentjen,Denis Franchimont,Károly Palatka,Harald Peeters,Tamás Molnár,Wouter Van Moerkercke,Triana Lobatón Ortega,A Colard,Guy Lambrecht,Édouard Louis,Joris Dutré,Philip Caenepeel,Wout Mares,Jeroen P. Jansen,J van der Woude,Pál Miheller,Filip Baert,Geert D’Haens
摘要
Abstract Background and Aims We explored the potential for differential efficacy of vedolizumab between early and late ulcerative colitis [UC] with evaluation of clinical, endoscopic, and histological endpoints. Methods This was a multicentre, multinational, open-label study in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, defining early UC by a disease duration <4 years and bio-naïve and late UC by a disease duration > 4 years and additional exposure to tumour necrosis factor antagonists. Patients received standard treatment with intravenous vedolizumab for 52 weeks [300 mg Weeks 0, 2, 6, every 8 weeks thereafter without escalation]. The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission with endoscopic improvement [total Mayo score ≤2 with no subscore >1] at both Weeks 26 and 52. Results A total of 121 patients were included: in the “early” group, 25/59 [42.4%] achieved the primary endpoint versus 19/62 [30.6%] in the “late” group [p = 0.18]. There were no significant differences between the two groups in endoscopic improvement [Week 26: “early” 32/59 [54.2%] versus “late” 29/62 [46.8%]; p = 0.412; Week 52: 27/59 [45.8%] versus 25/62 [40.3%]; p = 0.546] or in histological remission [Robarts Histopathology Index <3 without neutrophils in the epithelium and lamina propria] [Week 26: 24/59 [40.7%] versus 21/62 [33.9%]; p = 0.439; Week 52: 22/59 [37.3%] versus 22/62 [35.5%]; p = 0.837]. Conclusions No significant differences in clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes were observed between “early” and “late” disease.