Heterogeneity and Utility of Pharmaceutical Company Sharing of Individual-Participant Data Packages

医学 临床试验 审计 数据共享 缺少数据 数据质量 数据收集 梅德林 医学物理学 家庭医学 替代医学 内科学 病理 运营管理 会计 计算机科学 经济 政治学 法学 公制(单位) 业务 数学 机器学习 统计
作者
Ashley M. Hopkins,Natansh D. Modi,Ahmad Y. Abuhelwa,Ganessan Kichenadasse,Nicole M. Kuderer,Gary H. Lyman,Michael Wiese,Ross A. McKinnon,Frank W. Rockhold,A. Mann,Andrew Rowland,Michael J. Sorich
出处
期刊:JAMA Oncology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:9 (12): 1621-1621 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.3996
摘要

The pharmaceutical industry has made substantial investments in developing processes for sharing individual-participant data (IPD) from clinical trials. However, the utility and completeness of shared IPD and supporting documents must be evaluated to ensure the potential for scientific advancements from the data sharing ecosystem can be realized.To assess the utility and completeness of IPD and supporting documents provided from industry-sponsored clinical trials.From February 9, 2022, to February 9, 2023, 91 of 203 clinical trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration registrations of anticancer medicines for the treatment of solid tumors from the past decade were confirmed as eligible for IPD request. This quality improvement study performed a retrospective audit of the utility and completeness of the IPD and supporting documents provided from the 91 clinical trials for a planned meta-analysis.Request for IPD from 91 clinical oncology trials indicated as eligible for the request.The utility and completeness of the IPD and supporting documents provided.The IPD packages were obtained from 70 of 91 requested clinical trials (77%). The median time to data provision was 123 (range, 117-352) days. Redactions were observed in 18 of the acquired IPD packages (26%) for outcome data, 11 (16%) for assessment variables, and 19 (27%) for adjustment data. Additionally, 20 IPD packages (29%) lacked a clinical study report, 4 (6%) had incomplete or missing data dictionaries, and 20 (29%) were missing anonymization or redaction description files. Access to IPD from 21 eligible trials (23%) was not granted.In this quality improvement study, there was substantial variability within the provided IPD packages regarding the completeness of key data variables and supporting documents. To improve the data sharing ecosystem, key areas for enhancement include (1) ensuring that clinical trials are eligible for IPD sharing, (2) making eligible IPD transparently accessible, and (3) ensuring that IPD packages meet a standard of utility and completeness.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI2S应助慕梦安采纳,获得10
2秒前
BBB完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
win完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
隐形曼青应助努力毕业、采纳,获得10
9秒前
zjf完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
搜集达人应助浏阳河采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
互助遵法尚德应助墨墨采纳,获得10
10秒前
JxJ完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
所所应助123采纳,获得10
11秒前
14秒前
15秒前
专一的荧发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Lucas应助Young采纳,获得10
16秒前
寻觅完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
17秒前
Hh完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
18秒前
tan90发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
满意非笑发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
浏阳河发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
平陵发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
25秒前
所所应助dakdake大可采纳,获得10
26秒前
wjclear发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
英姑应助曾经二娘采纳,获得10
27秒前
30秒前
迅速友容发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
雪白问兰应助橘猫的鱼采纳,获得10
30秒前
30秒前
31秒前
英俊的铭应助墨墨采纳,获得10
33秒前
zyy_cwdl发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
恶恶么v发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
36秒前
37秒前
wjclear完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
高分求助中
Evolution 10000
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2800
юрские динозавры восточного забайкалья 800
English Wealden Fossils 700
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
A new species of Velataspis (Hemiptera Coccoidea Diaspididae) from tea in Assam 500
Diagnostic immunohistochemistry : theranostic and genomic applications 6th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3155941
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2807235
关于积分的说明 7872173
捐赠科研通 2465563
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1312264
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 629977
版权声明 601905