医学
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术
可视模拟标度
内固定
外科
随机对照试验
颈椎病
骨性融合
颈部疼痛
固定(群体遗传学)
颈椎
临床终点
脊柱融合术
颈椎
射线照相术
人口
替代医学
环境卫生
病理
作者
Chengyi Huang,Xia-Qing Sheng,X Wang,Zihan Peng,Tingkui Wu,Kangkang Huang,Yang Meng
出处
期刊:Spine
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2025-03-20
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000005334
摘要
Background Context. The insertion process of the new two-screw internal fixation is simpler than that of four-screw internal fixation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in fusion rate. Purpose. This study aimed to compare the time required to achieve osseous fusion and the clinical efficacy of four-screw versus two-screw internal fixation. Study Design. Prospective randomized controlled trial. Patient Sample. From October 2021 to April 2023, eighty patients diagnosed with single-level cervical spondylosis were recruited and randomly allocated into a four- or two-screw group. Outcome Measures. The primary endpoint was the fusion rate six months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of complications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale scores for arm and neck pain. Methods. Patients were randomized to receive four-screw internal fixation (n=40) or two-screw internal fixation (n=40). Results. A total of 77 patients completed the trial and were included in the analysis. No significant differences were observed between groups at baseline. The fusion rate in the two-screw group was significantly higher than that in the four-screw group (69.2% vs. 42.1%, P =0.022) at six months postoperatively. No significant difference was found in the fusion rates at 3 and 12 months postoperatively between groups. Overall, PROMs significantly improved after surgery in both groups and did not differ significantly between groups at any follow-up time point. The prevalence of complications was not significantly different between groups. Conclusions. Two-screw internal fixation can achieve osseous fusion faster than four-screw internal fixation in ACDF. Two-screw internal fixation seems to achieve the same PROMs and safety as four-screw internal fixation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI