医学
优势比
内科学
科克伦图书馆
置信区间
荟萃分析
不利影响
炎症性肠病
梅德林
系统回顾
治疗药物监测
重症监护医学
疾病
药代动力学
政治学
法学
作者
Noemí Manceñido,Blanca Novella Arribas,Gustavo Mora Navarro,Francisco Rodríguez Salvanés,Pilar Loeches Belinchón,Javier P. Gisbert
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2023.06.028
摘要
A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) versus conventional management during maintenance treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNFα) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).A search was conducted up to January 2022 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). The primary outcome was the ability to maintain clinical remission at 12 months. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.Nine studies were identified: one systematic review, six randomised clinical trials, and two cohort studies. No superior efficacy of proactive TDM [relative risk 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.37, n=528; I2=55%] was shown. Proactive TDM could improve the durability of anti-TNFα treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.12; 95%CI: 0.05-0.27; n=390; I2=45%), prevent acute infusion reactions (OR 0.21; 95%CI: 0.05-0.82; n=390; I2=0%), decrease adverse events (OR 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15-0.98; n=390; I2=14%), and reduce the probability of surgery, at lower economical expenditure.The analysed evidence did not confirm the superiority of proactive TDM of anti-TNFα treatment over conventional management in patients with IBD, so proactive TDM should not currently be recommended.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI