特立帕肽
医学
骨矿物
骨质疏松症
中止
股骨颈
内科学
泌尿科
作者
Martin C Hartz,Fabian B Johannessen,Torben Harsløf,Bente Langdahl
标识
DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgae484
摘要
Abstract Purpose The purpose of this observational study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of romosozumab (ROMO) and teriparatide (TPTD) in a clinical setting. Methods 315 postmenopausal women were included based on the reimbursement criteria for ROMO and TPTD at the Department of Endocrinology at Aarhus University Hospital. ROMO: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-score <-2.5 (femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), or lumbar spine (LS)) + a fragility fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, distal forearm, or proximal humerus) within 3 years. TPTD: Within 3 years ≥2 vertebral fractures or 1 vertebral fracture + BMD T-score (FN, TH, or LS) <-3. Data was collected from medical records. The primary end point was percentage change from baseline in BMD (FN, TH, and LS) at month 12. BMD was measured by DXA. Results At month 12 ROMO led to significantly (p<0.001) larger increases than TPTD in BMD (FN: 4.8% vs. 0.2%, TH: 5.7% vs. 0.3%, and LS: 13.7% vs. 9.3%). Discontinuation rate was lower with ROMO than with TPTD. Lower incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was observed with ROMO compared to TPTD. Treatment-naïve patients had non-significantly higher BMD increases compared to previously treated patients with both ROMO and TPTD. Conclusion Treatment with romosozumab yields larger increases in bone mineral density than teriparatide after 12 months and a higher rate of completion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI