诊断优势比
荟萃分析
出版偏见
诊断试验中的似然比
优势比
医学
内科学
肿瘤科
置信区间
接收机工作特性
生物标志物
生物
遗传学
作者
Amir Hossein Aalami,Amirhossein Sahebkar,Hossein Abdeahad,Ali Mohammad Mokhtari,Farnoosh Aalami,Amir Amirabadi,Ehsan Kargar Aliabadi,Omid Pirzade
标识
DOI:10.2174/0929867330666230509110111
摘要
Introduction: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) serve as noninvasive diagnostic markers in many cancers. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of circulating microRNAs for melanoma. Material and Methods: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and ROC curve were evaluated using the Meta-Disc V.1.4 and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V.3.3 software packages. To investigate the heterogeneity, the I2 and Chi-square tests were used. The publishing bias was evaluated using Begg’s rank correlation and Egger regression asymmetry tests. Results: A total of 9 articles covering 13 studies (more than 50 miRs individually and in combination) were included, containing 1,355 participants (878 cases and 477 controls). The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and AUC were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76–0.81), 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77–0.83), 4.32 (95% CI: 3.21-5.82), 0.17 (95% CI: 0.09-0.32), 28.0 (95% CI: 15.34-51.09), and 0.91, respectively. According to Begg's and Egger's tests, there was no publication bias (Begg's p = 0.160 and Egger's p = 0.289). Conclusion: Circulating miRNAs can serve as fair and non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers for melanoma. Additionally, specific miRNAs still need to be discovered for diagnosing melanoma.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI