Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Hypertension and Risk of Epilepsy

医学 倾向得分匹配 癫痫 内科学 队列 入射(几何) 队列研究 回顾性队列研究 比例危险模型 钙通道阻滞剂 观察研究 血压 精神科 光学 物理
作者
Xuerong Wen,Marianne N. Otoo,Jie Tang,Todd Brothers,Kristina E. Ward,Nicole J. Asal,Kimford J. Meador
出处
期刊:JAMA Neurology [American Medical Association]
卷期号:81 (8): 866-866 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1714
摘要

Importance Animal and human studies have suggested that the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be associated with a lower risk of incident epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive medications. However, observational data from the US are lacking. Objective To evaluate the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in subgroups of US patients with hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from a national health administrative database from January 2010 to December 2017 with propensity score (PS) matching. The eligible cohort included privately insured individuals aged 18 years or older with diagnosis of primary hypertension and dispensed at least 1 ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), β-blocker, or calcium channel blocker (CCB) from 2010 to 2017. Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy at or before the index date or dispensed an antiseizure medication 12 months before or 90 days after initiating the study medications were excluded. The data analysis for this project was conducted from April 2022 to April 2024. Exposures Propensity scores were generated based on baseline covariates and used to match patients who received ARBs with those who received either ACEIs, β-blockers, CCBs, or a combination of these antihypertensive medications. Main Outcomes and Measures Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate epilepsy incidence during follow-up comparing the ARB cohort with other antihypertensive classes. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the association between ARB use and epilepsy incidence in various subgroups. Results Of 2 261 964 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [13.9] years; 1 120 630 [49.5%] female) included, 309 978 received ARBs, 807 510 received ACEIs, 695 887 received β-blockers, and 448 589 received CCBs. Demographic and clinical characteristics differed across the 4 comparison groups prior to PS matching. Compared with ARB users, patients receiving ACEIs were predominantly male and had diabetes, CCB users were generally older (eg, >65 years), and β-blocker users had more comorbidities and concurrent medications. The 1:1 PS-matched subgroups included 619 858 patients for ARB vs ACEI, 619 828 patients for ARB vs β-blocker, and 601 002 patients for ARB vs CCB. Baseline characteristics were equally distributed between comparison groups after matching with propensity scores. Use of ARBs was associated with a decreased incidence of epilepsy compared with ACEIs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96), β-blockers (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.90), and a combination of other antihypertensive classes (aHR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant association between ARB use (primarily losartan) and epilepsy incidence in patients with no preexisting history of stroke or cardiovascular disease. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that ARBs, mainly losartan, were associated with a lower incidence of epilepsy compared with other antihypertensive agents in hypertensive patients with no preexisting stroke or cardiovascular disease. Further studies, such as randomized clinical trials, are warranted to confirm the comparative antiepileptogenic properties of antihypertensive medications.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
SciGPT应助三木采纳,获得10
刚刚
852应助sinian思念采纳,获得10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助魔幻寄琴采纳,获得10
1秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Q清风慕竹完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
wzdxmt发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Singularity应助kun采纳,获得10
3秒前
邓苏威完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI6.1应助wanna采纳,获得30
5秒前
5秒前
kiki发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
9秒前
vv完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
ANKAR完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
yelide发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
zyl发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
卡卡完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
小小发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Kevin完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
桃桃发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
张秉环完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
三木发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
邓苏威发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
sinian思念发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
RJ应助小年小少采纳,获得10
18秒前
lilili完成签到,获得积分0
18秒前
ramia完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
流云完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
乐乐应助凶狠的翅膀采纳,获得10
18秒前
华仔应助寒钟过雨声采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
顾矜应助王粒伊采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 生物化学 化学工程 物理 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6022788
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7644468
关于积分的说明 16170630
捐赠科研通 5171139
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2766992
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1750381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1636980