心理学
控制(管理)
意义(存在)
认知心理学
行为科学
响应偏差
常用方法方差
社会心理学
计算机科学
人工智能
心理治疗师
作者
Philip M. Podsakoff,Scott MacKenzie,Nathan P. Podsakoff
出处
期刊:Annual Review of Psychology
[Annual Reviews]
日期:2011-03-02
卷期号:63 (1): 539-569
被引量:11278
标识
DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
摘要
Despite the concern that has been expressed about potential method biases, and the pervasiveness of research settings with the potential to produce them, there is disagreement about whether they really are a problem for researchers in the behavioral sciences. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to explore the current state of knowledge about method biases. First, we explore the meaning of the terms “method” and “method bias” and then we examine whether method biases influence all measures equally. Next, we review the evidence of the effects that method biases have on individual measures and on the covariation between different constructs. Following this, we evaluate the procedural and statistical remedies that have been used to control method biases and provide recommendations for minimizing method bias.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI