作者
Stefania Oliva,Maria Teresa Petrucci,Vittorio Montefusco,Concetta Conticello,Pellegrino Musto,Lucio Catalano,Andrea Evangelista,Stefano Spada,Philip Campbell,Roberto Ria,Marco Salvini,Massimo Offidani,Angelo Michele Carella,Paola Omedè,Anna Marina Liberati,Rossella Troia,Anna Maria Cafro,Alessandra Malfitano,Antonietta Falcone,Tommaso Caravita,Francesca Patriarca,Arnon Nagler,Andrew Spencer,Roman Hájek,Antônio Palumbo,Mario Boccadoro
摘要
In newly diagnosed myeloma patients, upfront autologous transplant (ASCT) prolongs progression-free survival 1 (PFS1) compared with chemotherapy plus lenalidomide (CC+R). Salvage ASCT at first relapse may still effectively rescue patients who did not receive upfront ASCT. To evaluate the long-term benefit of upfront ASCT vs CC+R and the impact of salvage ASCT in patients who received upfront CC+R, we conducted a pooled analysis of 2 phase III trials (RV-MM-209 and EMN-441). Primary endpoints were PFS1, progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), overall survival (OS). A total of 268 patients were randomized to 2 courses of melphalan 200 mg/m2 and ASCT (MEL200-ASCT) and 261 to CC+R. Median follow-up was 46 months. MEL200-ASCT significantly improved PFS1 (median: 42 vs 24 months, HR 0.53; P<0.001), PFS2 (4 years: 71 vs 54%, HR 0.53, P<0.001) and OS (4 years: 84 vs 70%, HR 0.51, P<0.001) compared with CC+R. The advantage was noticed in good and bad prognosis patients. Only 53% of patients relapsing from CC+R received ASCT at first relapse. Upfront ASCT significantly reduced the risk of death (HR 0.51; P=0.007) in comparison with salvage ASCT. In conclusion, these data confirm the role of upfront ASCT as the standard approach for all young myeloma patients.