Oral semaglutide versus subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 4): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3a trial

赛马鲁肽 利拉鲁肽 医学 安慰剂 内科学 双盲 2型糖尿病 糖尿病 内分泌学 病理 替代医学
作者
Richard E. Pratley,Aslam Amod,Søren T. Hoff,Takashi Kadowaki,Ildiko Lingvay,Michael A. Nauck,Karen Boje Pedersen,Trine Saugstrup,Juris J. Meier
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:394 (10192): 39-50 被引量:537
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31271-1
摘要

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are effective treatments for type 2 diabetes, lowering glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight, but are currently only approved for use as subcutaneous injections. Oral semaglutide, a novel GLP-1 agonist, was compared with subcutaneous liraglutide and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes.In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3a trial, we recruited patients with type 2 diabetes from 100 sites in 12 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with HbA1c of 7·0-9·5% (53-80·3 mmol/mol), on a stable dose of metformin (≥1500 mg or maximum tolerated) with or without a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) with an interactive web-response system and stratified by background glucose-lowering medication and country of origin, to once-daily oral semaglutide (dose escalated to 14 mg), once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (dose escalated to 1·8 mg), or placebo for 52 weeks. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy (regardless of study drug discontinuation or rescue medication) and trial product (assumed all participants were on study drug without rescue medication) in all participants who were randomly assigned. The treatment policy estimand was the primary estimand. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and non-inferiority [margin: 0·4%] and superiority vs subcutaneous liraglutide) and the confirmatory secondary endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in bodyweight (oral semaglutide superiority vs placebo and liraglutide). Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02863419, and the European Clinical Trials registry, number EudraCT 2015-005210-30.Between Aug 10, 2016, and Feb 7, 2017, 950 patients were screened, of whom 711 were eligible and randomly assigned to oral semaglutide (n=285), subcutaneous liraglutide (n=284), or placebo (n=142). 341 (48%) of 711 participants were female and the mean age was 56 years (SD 10). All participants were given at least one dose of study drug, and 277 (97%) participants in the oral semaglutide group, 274 (96%) in the liraglutide group, and 134 (94%) in the placebo group completed the 52-week trial period. Mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 26 was -1·2% (SE 0·1) with oral semaglutide, -1·1% (SE 0·1) with subcutaneous liraglutide, and -0·2% (SE 0·1) with placebo. Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide in decreasing HbA1c (estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0·1%, 95% CI -0·3 to 0·0; p<0·0001) and superior to placebo (ETD -1·1%, -1·2 to -0·9; p<0·0001) by use of the treatment policy estimand. By use of the trial product estimand, oral semaglutide had significantly greater decreases in HbA1c than both subcutaneous liraglutide (ETD -0·2%, 95% CI -0·3 to -0·1; p=0·0056) and placebo (ETD -1·2%, -1·4 to -1·0; p<0·0001) at week 26. Oral semaglutide resulted in superior weight loss (-4·4 kg [SE 0·2]) compared with liraglutide (-3·1 kg [SE 0·2]; ETD -1·2 kg, 95% CI -1·9 to -0·6; p=0·0003) and placebo (-0·5 kg [SE 0·3]; ETD -3·8 kg, -4·7 to -3·0; p<0·0001) at week 26 (treatment policy). By use of the trial product estimand, weight loss at week 26 was significantly greater with oral semaglutide than with subcutaneous liraglutide (-1·5 kg, 95% CI -2·2 to -0·9; p<0·0001) and placebo (ETD -4·0 kg, -4·8 to -3·2; p<0·0001). Adverse events were more frequent with oral semaglutide (n=229 [80%]) and subcutaneous liraglutide (n=211 [74%]) than with placebo (n=95 [67%]).Oral semaglutide was non-inferior to subcutaneous liraglutide and superior to placebo in decreasing HbA1c, and superior in decreasing bodyweight compared with both liraglutide and placebo at week 26. Safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide were similar to subcutaneous liraglutide. Use of oral semaglutide could potentially lead to earlier initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in the diabetes treatment continuum of care.Novo Nordisk A/S.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
淳于一江完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
a61完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
fu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
NexusExplorer应助稻草人采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
传奇3应助Gtingting采纳,获得20
3秒前
树下小草发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
wd发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
呼呼哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
Ava应助Yan1961采纳,获得10
4秒前
平安完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
老迟到的贝壳完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
cwy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
zeng完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
v0id应助MayFun采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
顺利月亮完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
15完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
有胆量的小熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
李松林发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
粗犷的翎应助JoJoT采纳,获得10
13秒前
田様应助嗯嗯采纳,获得10
13秒前
null应助加菲丰丰采纳,获得60
13秒前
斯文思远完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
大方颦发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
八爷啦啦啦完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
16秒前
16秒前
clione发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
上官若男应助疯狂吃辣采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7516311
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9104298
关于积分的说明 19435055
捐赠科研通 7121295
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3253770
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2422515
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2240610