储能
压缩空气储能
电池(电)
工艺工程
环境科学
按来源划分的电力成本
电
计算机数据存储
核工程
泄流深度
功率(物理)
电气工程
汽车工程
计算机科学
工程类
发电
物理
热力学
操作系统
作者
Coriolano Salvini,Ambra Giovannelli
出处
期刊:Energy Reports
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2022-04-06
卷期号:8: 601-607
被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.170
摘要
In the present paper, D-CAES storage systems are compared with Sodium–Sulfur (Na–S) and Lithium-ion (Li-ion) based ones on the basis of the Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS). Utility-scale systems characterized by a rated power in the range of 5–20 MW and storage capacity of tens/hundreds megawatt-hours have been addressed. Analyses have been carried out by varying key parameters such as the installed power, the charge/discharge time periods, the price of electricity and the fuel cost. Results show that the adoption of D-CAES systems can lead to a better economic performance in respect to BES technologies. Na–S battery based systems show a better economic performance in comparison with Li-ion based ones. It has been noticed how D-CAES economic performance improves by increasing the size of the system both in terms of installed power and storage capacity. D-CAES solutions can achieve a LCOS lower than that shown by Na–S batteries, provided that the size of the system and the price of electricity are large enough.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI