An Indirect Treatment Comparison of Semaglutide 2.0 mg vs Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Using Multilevel Network Meta-regression

赛马鲁肽 杜拉鲁肽 医学 优势比 2型糖尿病 荟萃分析 糖化血红素 内科学 内分泌学 糖尿病 艾塞那肽 利拉鲁肽
作者
Ildiko Lingvay,Robert Bauer,James Baker‐Knight,Jack Lawson,Richard E. Pratley
出处
期刊:The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism [The Endocrine Society]
卷期号:107 (5): 1461-1469 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgab905
摘要

Abstract Aims Currently, no head-to-head data are available comparing semaglutide 2.0 mg with dulaglutide 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of their effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods Multilevel network meta-regression was conducted, based on a connected evidence network of published results from the A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide (LY2189265) in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes 11 trial and individual patient data from the A Research Study to Compare Two Doses of Semaglutide Taken Once Weekly in People With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN) and SUSTAIN 7 trials. Results Semaglutide 2.0 mg significantly reduced HbA1c vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg, with estimated treatment differences (ETDs) of –0.44% points (95% credible interval [CrI], –0.68 to –0.19) and –0.28% points (95% CrI, –0.52 to –0.03), respectively. Semaglutide 2.0 mg also significantly reduced body weight vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg with ETDs of –3.29 kg (95% CrI, –4.62 to −1.96) and –2.57 kg (95% CrI, –3.90 to –1.24), respectively. Odds of achieving HbA1c < 7.0% were significantly greater for semaglutide 2.0 vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg (odds ratio [OR]: 2.23 [95% CrI, 1.15-3.90]), whereas this did not reach significance for semaglutide 2.0 mg vs dulaglutide 4.5 mg (OR: 1.58 [95% CrI, 0.82-2.78]). Sensitivity analyses supported the main analysis findings. Conclusions This ITC demonstrated significantly greater reductions from baseline in HbA1c and body weight with semaglutide 2.0 mg vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg. The findings of this study provide important comparative effectiveness information until randomized head-to-head studies become available.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
乐乐应助starry采纳,获得10
刚刚
温暖冰珍完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
淳之风完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
CarterXD应助hao采纳,获得30
1秒前
科研rain完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
清爽忆山发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
睡觉晒太阳完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
andy完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
Itachi12138完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
CipherSage应助蓝莓松饼采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
团团完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
追寻的易烟完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
snow完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
1111完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
爆米花应助笑点低蜜蜂采纳,获得10
4秒前
橘子味汽水完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Victor陈完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
seed85完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
最初完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
Hello应助Chem is try采纳,获得10
5秒前
hhh发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
落寞白曼完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
海鸥海鸥发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
别让我误会完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
KK发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
娃娃完成签到 ,获得积分20
9秒前
科研通AI5应助结实的冰真采纳,获得30
9秒前
冷静的小熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Donnie完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
若尘完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527304
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107454
关于积分的说明 9285518
捐赠科研通 2805269
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539827
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716708
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709672