An Indirect Treatment Comparison of Semaglutide 2.0 mg vs Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Using Multilevel Network Meta-regression

赛马鲁肽 杜拉鲁肽 医学 优势比 2型糖尿病 荟萃分析 糖化血红素 内科学 内分泌学 糖尿病 艾塞那肽 利拉鲁肽
作者
Ildiko Lingvay,Robert Bauer,James Baker‐Knight,Jack Lawson,Richard E. Pratley
出处
期刊:The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism [The Endocrine Society]
卷期号:107 (5): 1461-1469 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgab905
摘要

Abstract Aims Currently, no head-to-head data are available comparing semaglutide 2.0 mg with dulaglutide 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison (ITC) of their effects on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods Multilevel network meta-regression was conducted, based on a connected evidence network of published results from the A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide (LY2189265) in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes 11 trial and individual patient data from the A Research Study to Compare Two Doses of Semaglutide Taken Once Weekly in People With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN) and SUSTAIN 7 trials. Results Semaglutide 2.0 mg significantly reduced HbA1c vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg, with estimated treatment differences (ETDs) of –0.44% points (95% credible interval [CrI], –0.68 to –0.19) and –0.28% points (95% CrI, –0.52 to –0.03), respectively. Semaglutide 2.0 mg also significantly reduced body weight vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg with ETDs of –3.29 kg (95% CrI, –4.62 to −1.96) and –2.57 kg (95% CrI, –3.90 to –1.24), respectively. Odds of achieving HbA1c < 7.0% were significantly greater for semaglutide 2.0 vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg (odds ratio [OR]: 2.23 [95% CrI, 1.15-3.90]), whereas this did not reach significance for semaglutide 2.0 mg vs dulaglutide 4.5 mg (OR: 1.58 [95% CrI, 0.82-2.78]). Sensitivity analyses supported the main analysis findings. Conclusions This ITC demonstrated significantly greater reductions from baseline in HbA1c and body weight with semaglutide 2.0 mg vs dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg. The findings of this study provide important comparative effectiveness information until randomized head-to-head studies become available.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
桐桐应助HY采纳,获得10
3秒前
lxj发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
wenshuo发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
我是老大应助犹豫傲南采纳,获得10
6秒前
Janet_Jing完成签到 ,获得积分20
7秒前
调皮老头发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
lingo完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
17秒前
Chasing完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
可乐龙猫完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
搜集达人应助aaa采纳,获得30
24秒前
25秒前
共享精神应助夏天无采纳,获得10
26秒前
27秒前
AU发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
31秒前
Charming完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
科研通AI2S应助asd采纳,获得10
31秒前
英俊的铭应助xuan采纳,获得10
31秒前
32秒前
SciGPT应助kiki采纳,获得10
32秒前
32秒前
与久发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
Jenny发布了新的文献求助30
34秒前
35秒前
在水一方应助呵呵心情采纳,获得10
36秒前
犹豫傲南发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
123完成签到,获得积分20
36秒前
zyx174733完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
36秒前
Neon发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
39秒前
吴糖完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
小致完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
42秒前
42秒前
小笼包完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
Essentials of thematic analysis 700
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
Revolution und Konterrevolution in China [by A. Losowsky] 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3124648
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2774953
关于积分的说明 7724821
捐赠科研通 2430484
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1291144
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 622066
版权声明 600323