医学
等级间信度
物理疗法
神经学
卡帕
神经系统检查
冲程(发动机)
脑梗塞
急诊科
评定量表
物理医学与康复
急性中风
外科
精神科
心理学
缺血
哲学
发展心理学
工程类
机械工程
语言学
作者
Thomas G. Brott,Harold P. Adams,Charles P. Olinger,John R. Marler,William G. Barsan,Jose Billér,Judith Spilker,Reneé Holleran,Robert Eberle,Vicki Hertzberg
出处
期刊:Stroke
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:1989-07-01
卷期号:20 (7): 864-870
被引量:4492
标识
DOI:10.1161/01.str.20.7.864
摘要
We designed a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale for use in acute stroke therapy trials. In a study of 24 stroke patients, interrater reliability for the scale was found to be high (mean kappa = 0.69), and test-retest reliability was also high (mean kappa = 0.66-0.77). Test-retest reliability did not differ significantly among a neurologist, a neurology house officer, a neurology nurse, or an emergency department nurse. The stroke scale validity was assessed by comparing the scale scores obtained prospectively on 65 acute stroke patients to the patients' infarction size as measured by computed tomography scan at 1 week and to the patients' clinical outcome as determined at 3 months. These correlations (scale-lesion size r = 0.68, scale-outcome r = 0.79) suggested acceptable examination and scale validity. Of the 15 test items, the most interrater reliable item (pupillary response) had low validity. Less reliable items such as upper or lower extremity motor function were more valid. We discuss methods for improving the reliability and validity of brief examination scales to be used in stroke therapy trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI